Los Estados anfitriones enfrentan el desafío de proteger a sus ciudadanos de violaciones de derechos humanos causadas por multinacionales. Este artículo explica las bases de las obligaciones de los Estados bajo el derecho internacional de derechos humanos y cómo inversores extranjeros pueden ser responsabilizados.
Burlington Resources Inc. vs. la República de Ecuador, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/08/5
Burlington Resources Inc. vs. La República de Ecuador, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/08/5
El Presidente ecuatoriano Rafael Correa formalizó el 16 de mayo de 2017 la salida de Ecuador de los tratados bilaterales de inversión celebrados con 16 países.
(English) Murphy Exploration & Production Company – International v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-16 (formerly AA 434) – Inaê Siqueira de Oliveira
(English) Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA No. 2012-2 – Matthew Levine
Argentina and Ecuador are now well experienced in ISDS and have had some success in defending domestic interests from investor claims. Lessons from these prior experiences could benefit other countries, particularly in the developing world, as they devise their legal defence strategies.
(English) Three reports by CAITISA, Ecuador’s citizen audit commission on bilateral investment treaties (BITs), were leaked by online newspaper Diagonal on January 24, 2016.
(English) Perenco Ecuador Limited v. Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/6