Todas las demandas desestimadas por tribunal del CIADI en caso de inversor en energía bajo el TCE contra Italia
Belenergia S.A. vs. la República de Italia, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/15/40
Belenergia S.A. vs. la República de Italia, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/15/40
Glencore International A.G. y C.I. Prodeco S.A. vs. La República de Colombia, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/16/6
Cube Infrastructure Fund SICAV y Otros vs. El Reino de España, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/15/20
United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. y Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi vs. La República de Estonia, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/14/24
9REN Holding S.À.R.L. vs. El Reino de España, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/15/15
RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LIMITED Y RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A R.L. VS. EL REINO DE ESPAÑA, CASO DEL CIADI NO. ARB/13/30
Greentech Energy Systems A/S & Ors. vs. La República de Italia, Arbitraje de la CCE V (2015/095)
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Teinver S.A., Transportes de Cercanías S.A. y Autobuses Urbanos del Sur S.A. vs. La República Argentina, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/09/1
WNC Factoring Limited vs. La República Checa, Caso de la CPA No. 2014-34
Supervisión y Control S.A. vs. La República de Costa Rica, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/12/4
The Government of India has proposed a Joint Interpretative Statement to its bilateral investment treaty (BIT) partners. The statement clarifies key substantive and procedural provisions, bringing them more in line with India’s new foreign investment policy.
Brasil y Mozambique firmaron el 30 de marzo de 2015 el primer Acuerdo de Cooperación y Facilitación de Inversiones (ACFI) basado en el nuevo modelo de tratado bilateral de inversión (TBI) de Brasil. El segundo se firmó el 1 de abril de 2015 entre Brasil y Angola. A diferencia de los TBI tradicionales, que están orientados a la protección de los inversores, los ACFI se centran principalmente en la cooperación y la facilitación de inversiones. Promueven formas amigables de resolver disputas y proponen la solución de disputas entre estados como respaldo; en particular, no incluyen disposiciones sobre arbitraje inversor-estado.
US$1.76 billion dollar award levied against Ecuador in dispute with Occidental; tribunal split over damages Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11 Damon Vis-Dunbar The Republic of Ecuador has been ordered to pay US$1,769,625,000 billion in damages—the largest award to be handed down […]
Majority declines jurisdiction in claim against Argentina over domestic litigation requirement Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1 Damon Vis-Dunbar A claim against Argentina by a subsidiary of the German automotive firm Daimler A.G. has failed on its merits because the claimant did not first bring the dispute to court in […]
The South African Development Community (SADC) Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Template and Commentary was completed in June 2012 by Member States of the Community. Its completion marks the end of an 18 month process of consultations and drafting among government representatives and is intended as a guide for member states in future investment treaty negotiations.
[T]he Tribunal must balance the legitimate and reasonable expectations of the Claimants with […] [the] right to regulate the provision of a vital public service.[1] This quote from an investment arbitration tribunal highlights the relationship between international investment law and the regulation of public services. This essay illustrates areas of contention between the requirements of […]
Argentina on the hook for breach of Fair and Equitable Treatment Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19) Lise Johnson On 30 July 2010, the ICSID tribunal in Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal v. Argentina issued a decision […]
By Damon Vis-Dunbar 2 October 2009 Correction: The original headline in this article stated that Chevron Corporation alleges a denial of justice on the part of Ecuador. Chevron explains that this is incorrect. While Chevron claims that Ecuador «abuses the criminal justice system», its notice of arbitration does not assert a denial of justice. The world’s second […]
By Damon Vis-Dunbar 29 August 2008 The electricity provider Electroquil SA has been awarded US$ 5,578,566 plus interest stemming from several breaches of power purchase agreements (PPAs) backed by the government of Ecuador. While Ecuador was also found to have breached the Ecuador-US bilateral investment treaty, those violations did not result in additional monetary damages. […]