España declarada culpable por violación de TJE bajo el TCE por frustrar las expectativas legítimas de 9REN, inversor en energías renovables con sede en Luxemburgo
9REN Holding S.À.R.L. vs. El Reino de España, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/15/15
Cláusula Paraguas
Tribunal del CIADI concluye que España incumplió sus obligaciones del TCE al no brindar una tasa de retorno razonable
RREEF INFRASTRUCTURE (G.P.) LIMITED Y RREEF PAN-EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE TWO LUX S.A R.L. VS. EL REINO DE ESPAÑA, CASO DEL CIADI NO. ARB/13/30
Italia declarada culpable por cambio en política de energías renovables en arbitraje intra-UE
Greentech Energy Systems A/S & Ors. vs. La República de Italia, Arbitraje de la CCE V (2015/095)
(English) CMS v. Argentina
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
(English) Continental Casualty v. Argentina
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
(English) SGS v. Pakistan
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
(English) Siemens v. Argentina
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
(English) SGS v. Philippines
Disculpa, pero esta entrada está disponible sólo en Inglés Estadounidense.
Argentina debe pagar más de USD320 millones por expropiación ilícita en caso de aerolíneas
Teinver S.A., Transportes de Cercanías S.A. y Autobuses Urbanos del Sur S.A. vs. La República Argentina, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/09/1
WNC c. Chequia: tribunal desestima demanda de expropiación y decide que no posee jurisdicción sobre todas las otras demandas
WNC Factoring Limited vs. La República Checa, Caso de la CPA No. 2014-34
Demandas de inversor español declaradas inadmisibles en caso contra Costa Rica
Supervisión y Control S.A. vs. La República de Costa Rica, Caso del CIADI No. ARB/12/4
India’s Joint Interpretive Statement for BITs: An Attempt to Slay the Ghosts of the Past
The Government of India has proposed a Joint Interpretative Statement to its bilateral investment treaty (BIT) partners. The statement clarifies key substantive and procedural provisions, bringing them more in line with India’s new foreign investment policy.
The Brazil–Mozambique and Brazil–Angola Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreements (CIFAs): A Descriptive Overview
(English) Brazil and Mozambique signed on March 30, 2015 the first Cooperation and Investment Facilitation Agreement (CIFA) based on Brazil’s new model bilateral investment treaty (BIT). The second was signed on April 1, 2015 between Brazil and Angola. Unlike traditional BITs, which are geared towards investor protection, the CIFAs focus primarily on cooperation and investment facilitation. They promote amicable ways to settle disputes and propose state–state dispute settlement as a backup; notably, they do not include provisions on investor–state arbitration.
Awards and Decisions
US$1.76 billion dollar award levied against Ecuador in dispute with Occidental; tribunal split over damages Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11 Damon Vis-Dunbar The Republic of Ecuador has been ordered to pay US$1,769,625,000 billion in damages—the largest award to be handed down […]
Awards and Decisions
Majority declines jurisdiction in claim against Argentina over domestic litigation requirement Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1 Damon Vis-Dunbar A claim against Argentina by a subsidiary of the German automotive firm Daimler A.G. has failed on its merits because the claimant did not first bring the dispute to court in […]
The SADC MODEL BIT Template: Investment for Sustainable Development
The South African Development Community (SADC) Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Template and Commentary was completed in June 2012 by Member States of the Community. Its completion marks the end of an 18 month process of consultations and drafting among government representatives and is intended as a guide for member states in future investment treaty negotiations.
Investment Law and Public Services: Clashes of Interests or Peaceful Coexistence?
[T]he Tribunal must balance the legitimate and reasonable expectations of the Claimants with […] [the] right to regulate the provision of a vital public service.[1] This quote from an investment arbitration tribunal highlights the relationship between international investment law and the regulation of public services. This essay illustrates areas of contention between the requirements of […]
Awards and Decisions
Argentina on the hook for breach of Fair and Equitable Treatment Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19) Lise Johnson On 30 July 2010, the ICSID tribunal in Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal v. Argentina issued a decision […]
Chevron launches investment-treaty claim against Ecuador
By Damon Vis-Dunbar 2 October 2009 Correction: The original headline in this article stated that Chevron Corporation alleges a denial of justice on the part of Ecuador. Chevron explains that this is incorrect. While Chevron claims that Ecuador “abuses the criminal justice system”, its notice of arbitration does not assert a denial of justice. The world’s second […]
Duke Energy Electroquil Partners and Electroquil SA v Ecuador: Ecuador found liable for breaches of power purchase agreements and investment treaty
By Damon Vis-Dunbar 29 August 2008 The electricity provider Electroquil SA has been awarded US$ 5,578,566 plus interest stemming from several breaches of power purchase agreements (PPAs) backed by the government of Ecuador. While Ecuador was also found to have breached the Ecuador-US bilateral investment treaty, those violations did not result in additional monetary damages. […]