The Criticality of Gender Equality in the Race for Critical Minerals
This IGF report examines how rising demand for cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, and nickel could deepen existing gender inequalities in the mining sector unless governments and companies act deliberately. The report analyzes risks to women’s rights in mining-affected communities particularly for Indigenous and rural women including impacts on land, livelihoods, food security, health, unpaid care work.
Policy Recommendations
-
Rising demand for critical minerals risks deepening gender inequalities unless governments and companies embed gender-responsive safeguards in mining governance.
-
Assess, monitor, and manage gendered impacts by applying intersectional gender analysis, collecting gender-disaggregated data, and integrating findings into costed, time-bound Gender Action Plans.
-
Require inclusive consultation, promote women’s agency, and secure consent by enabling safe, meaningful participation, community-led monitoring, and free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) as the best-practice standard.
-
Establish gender-equitable benefit-sharing mechanisms so women can access jobs, compensation, livelihood restoration, supplier opportunities, and community development benefits.
Critical minerals are essential to the global energy transition, digitalization, and industrial development. But the race to secure minerals such as cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, and nickel also risks deepening long-standing gender inequalities in the mining sector.
This IGF report, developed in partnership with the ILO and the UNDP, examines how the expansion of critical mineral extraction can affect women’s rights, particularly for Indigenous women, rural women, and women living in mining-affected communities. It looks at how environmental impacts, the location of mineral reserves, and accelerated permitting processes can increase risks related to land, livelihoods, food security, health, unpaid care work, safety, employment, consultation, and benefit sharing.
The report also identifies practical actions for governments and mining companies to make critical minerals governance more gender-responsive. These include integrating intersectional gender analysis into impact assessments, ensuring inclusive consultation and women’s meaningful participation, respecting free, prior, and informed consent, and establishing benefit-sharing mechanisms that expand women’s access to decent work, compensation, community development, and economic opportunities.
By placing gender equality at the centre of critical minerals governance, the publication argues that the transition to a low-carbon and digital future can become an opportunity to advance women’s rights, strengthen accountability, and support more inclusive and sustainable mineral development with gender-responsive policies in place.