Report

A Sustainable Asset Valuation Assessment of Building and Transport Infrastructure Investment in the Shymkent-Tashkent-Khujand Economic Corridor

This report presents the Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) of a proposed transport and building infrastructure development on the border of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to promote close and mutually beneficial trade relationships between the countries.

April 1, 2024

Plans have been developed to create both an International Center for Trade and Economic Cooperation (ICTEC) Central Asia and a trade and logistics centre between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to promote close and mutually beneficial trade relationships along the Shymkent–Tashkent–Khujand economic corridor. These projects aim to provide a modern and more efficient border crossing for people, vehicles, and goods, creating jobs, increasing trade and investment from the private sector, fostering economic cooperation, and boosting the tourism sector.

We carried out a Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) assessment of the transport and building infrastructure in the economic corridor. The objective of this assessment is to gain insight and raise awareness of the impact of sustainable infrastructure on the efficiency of trade, energy efficiency and energy use, congestion, commuting times, number of road accidents, CO2 emissions, and employment creation.

Report details

Topic
Infrastructure
Trade
Project
Sustainable Infrastructure Programme in Asia (SIPA)
Impact area
Sustainable Economies
Publisher
IISD
Copyright
IISD, 2024
Report

Financial Benefit-Sharing Issues for Critical Minerals: Challenges and opportunities for producing countries

Do policy-makers need to rethink fiscal policies to ensure the financial benefits from critical minerals are shared fairly?

March 22, 2024

Are current fiscal approaches and policies aligned with national strategies, including ensuring that mineral-rich developing countries collect an appropriate share of the financial benefits from critical minerals value chains? If not, what needs to change?

This report seeks to answer these fundamental questions about financial benefit sharing in relation to critical and strategic minerals for the energy and digital transition.

While the financial benefit-sharing challenges and opportunities in extracting and processing critical minerals are not fundamentally different from the commonly known challenges facing mining revenue collection in general, some nuances require further investigation. This report seeks to identify these nuances in the key features of critical minerals and the new challenges and opportunities they present to fiscal regulation.

Report

The State of Global Environmental Governance 2023

In global environmental talks in 2023, the focus across nearly all issue areas was funding implementation and reviewing performance.

March 12, 2024
  • 2023 saw a lot of stocktaking, from assessing progress toward the SDGs at their halfway point to the first global stocktake of climate action at UNFCCC COP 28.

  • Finance is central to nearly all environmental negotiations, but the geopolitics and economic woes of 2023 raised the stakes still higher.

  • 2023 wasn't all multilateral triumphs. Some outcomes were weaker than many hoped, representing what was politically possible but not necessarily ambitious.

The year saw the last of the COVID pandemic-delayed milestones completed. Countries adopted major decisions to improve global chemicals management and protect marine life in international waters. But most of the year was about making all these rules work.

Join the globetrotting Earth Negotiations Bulletin team as they review 2023's sustainable development negotiations, draw links between the talks, and look down the road to what the coming months hold for environmental multilateralism. With unique insights gained from observing talks on climate change, biodiversity, chemicals, SDGs, forests, land, and more, the fifth edition of The State of Global Environmental Governance explores both the triumphs and misses of the international effort to build a better future for our planet.

Foreword by Ambassador Peter Thomson, UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy for the Ocean.

Subscribe to ENB Update to receive free reports, photos, and videos from environmental negotiations around the world.

Report

Monitoring Progress in Green Public Procurement

Methods, challenges, and case studies from Denmark, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea, Slovenia, and the Netherlands

This report outlines the importance of monitoring progress in green public procurement (GPP) and highlights various methodologies, challenges, and recommendations to improve monitoring practices. The report focuses specifically on monitoring how GPP reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, this report showcases GPP monitoring practices in South Korea, Japan, Slovenia, Denmark, Malaysia, and the Netherlands as real-life examples.

March 12, 2024
  • Governments are making great strides in monitoring not just green procurement activities but also tangible impacts, such as reduced waste, carbon emissions, and pollution.

  • South Korea saved 665,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2017 through green public procurement while also creating 4,400 new jobs in the green economy.

  • The CO2 Performance Ladder helps to monitor suppliers’ carbon emissions and consider climate mitigation in public tenders.

Public procurement is responsible for approximately 15% of worldwide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, according to recent research from the World Economic Forum. “Greening” public procurement is therefore a critical strategy to support the reduction of GHG emissions related to government activities.

In recent years, the use of GPP increased significantly. Nearly all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries have formulated strategies or policies aimed at facilitating the integration of environmental goals into the public procurement process. To advance GPP, countries have reformed their legal and policy frameworks to enable or mandate GPP, improved the capacities of public procurers, and developed guidebooks, tools, and standard criteria for GPP. However, establishing GPP monitoring systems to track progress has often been an afterthought.

Effective GPP monitoring is key for countries to track progress toward their climate goals. For this report, we outline the importance of monitoring Green Public Procurement (GPP) and highlight the various methodologies, challenges and recommendations for improved monitoring practices. This report focuses specifically on improving the monitoring of the impact of GPP on GHG and carbon dioxide emission reductions.

An analysis of GPP practices in South Korea, Japan, Slovenia, Denmark, Malaysia, and the Netherlands reveals that successful GPP monitoring is driven by strong government support, effective collaboration, and access to necessary tools and resources. Despite these efforts, challenges such as insufficient data, knowledge constraints, and the complexity of GPP monitoring tools persist.

To address these challenges, we recommend that governments and procuring authorities

  • define clear GPP objectives and targets,
  • establish a legal and policy framework that mandates monitoring and establishes roles and responsibilities,
  • foster effective collaboration among various governmental bodies,
  • strengthen data management and control,
  • invest in training and capacity building for procurement staff, and
  • promote effective communication.

Implementing these recommendations will allow governments improve their efforts to monitor GPP and GPP impacts. This will, in turn provide, them with the necessary evidence to keep increasing GPP efforts and ensuring the use of public procurement as a driver of climate and sustainable development goals.

Report details

Report

Mapping India's Energy Policy 2023

A decade in action

How has government support for energy in India evolved over the last decade? As India strives to become a USD 5 trillion economy over the next 3 years, what will its energy mix be? Is government support and taxation aligned with its long-term net-zero commitment?

March 11, 2024
  • #BREAKING | India's #energy #subsidies increased to USD 39.3 billion in FY 2023-the highest amount in 9 years.

  • India adopted a #hybrid approach in 2023-supporting both #fossilfuels & #cleanenergy to address the needs of a growing #economy. But #fossilfuelsubsidies remain five times higher than #cleanenergy.

  • India's #EV #subsidies reached an all-time high at USD 1.2 billion in 2023, with India emerging as one of the fastest-growing markets for EVs-but the future of #government #support remains unclear.

Mapping India's Energy Policy 2023 is the latest publication in a series of annual updates on government support for energy in India. This year's publication highlights the key shifts in India's energy policy over the last decade, between fiscal year (FY) 2014 and FY 2023.

We found that India's fossil fuel subsidies have declined by 59% since 2014—an accomplishment that many other large economies have struggled to achieve. However, the 2022 energy crisis—together with India’s growing energy demand—has led the country to bolster all forms of energy supplies and adopt a mixed approach to fossil fuels and clean energy.

Key Findings:

  • India's mixed approach led its energy subsidies to increase to INR 3.2 lakh crore (USD 39.3 billion) in FY 2023—the highest amount in 9 years. Both clean energy and fossil fuel subsidies grew by around 40% from FY 2022.
  • Fossil fuels subsidies remained five times the subsidies for clean energy in FY 2023.
  • Following the 2022 energy crisis and soaring energy demand, India responded to peaking fossil fuel prices in 2022–23 by capping retail prices of petrol, diesel, and domestic liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), cutting taxes, providing direct budgetary transfers to businesses and consumers, and supporting existing energy supplies. As a result, oil and gas subsidies rose by 63% in FY 2023.
  • On the other hand, renewable energy subsidies also grew to INR 14,843 crore (USD 1.8 billion) in FY 2023, an 8% increase over FY 2022, but remain low when compared to fossil fuels.
  • During this period, India is also emerging as one of the fastest-growing markets for EVs, with EV subsidies reaching an all-time high in FY 2023—but the future of government support remains unclear.
  • Besides energy subsidies, the study also aggregates annual data on capital expenditure of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and lending by public financial institutions as critical state actors. It finds that new build-out plans of energy-related SOEs show early signs of diversification into clean energy, but spending remains too low to achieve India’s 2030 clean energy targets.

Based on these findings, the report also accompanies several recommendations for the consideration of policy-makers and relevant stakeholders. As India prepares for a full budget in July, the Government of India has an opportunity to design financial flows—starting with public financial flows under its direct control—consistent with its own net-zero targets and sustainable development.

Report details

Topic
Climate Change Mitigation
Energy
Subsidies
Project
Budgeting for India’s Energy Transition
Impact area
Climate
Publisher
IISD
Copyright
IISD, 2024
Report

Financing Transport Projects: Why integrating externalities matters for decision making

This briefing paper analyzes the importance of integrating externalities into financial analysis to improve decision making for infrastructure transport projects.

March 6, 2024

Transport is a crucial part of modern society, connecting communities and fostering development. However, the impact of the transport sector on the planet is huge, causing over 20% of global carbon dioxide emissions. It is therefore one of the main drivers of climate change while also having significant impacts on human health.

Financial decision-makers have the power to use investment to build better, greener transport. However, conventional financial analysis is inadequate in capturing the intricate dynamics of the modern world, as demonstrated by the surge in environmental challenges, social inequalities, and cyclical financial crises.

When assessing transport projects, non-financial considerations should be integrated, including the positive or negative externalities arising from the project. These are either the costs or benefits impacting third parties, including individuals or society.

For example, if a sustainable transport project improves air quality in a city, the resulting health benefits for the residents would constitute a positive externality. Conversely, negative externalities are costs that are similarly borne by third parties, such as pollution caused by vehicle emissions, which can have adverse effects on public health.

The persistent neglect of integrating these externalities means that investment continues to be driven toward carbon-intensive road transport, at the expense of sustainable transport alternatives. In this paper, we hope to encourage a more holistic approach to evaluating sustainable transport projects, enabling financial decision-makers to have a more comprehensive understanding of the project’s overall value and promote the development of more sustainable projects.

Participating experts

Report details

Topic
Infrastructure
Sustainable Finance
Project
The Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi)
Impact area
Sustainable Economies
Publisher
IISD
Copyright
IISD, 2024
Report

Global Market Report: Soybean prices and sustainability

Less than 3% of soybeans are produced in compliance with sustainability standards. This report unpacks what needs to change to make soybeans a food that protects rather than harms the natural environment.

February 28, 2024
  • The global soybean sector has experienced rapid growth in the past 5 decades and is now worth USD 155 billion. It is projected to reach USD 278 billion by 2031.

  • Less than 3% of soybeans are produced in compliance with sustainability standards, but the persistently slow growth in standard-compliant production appears to be accelerating.

  • Organic soybean producers in major exporting countries may have received prices 64% higher than those selling conventional, genetically modified soybeans in 2017.

Soybeans serve as an important source of protein for both humans and animals thanks to their versatility, affordability, and nutritional benefits. Around three quarters of soybean production is used for animal feed, and a fifth is consumed as edible oils and food products.

The global soybean sector has experienced rapid growth in the past 5 decades. But the sector is both vulnerable to and a driver of critical sustainability challenges, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and climate change. Establishing deforestation-free supply chains is critical to ensuring the sector sustains and nourishes us without harming the natural environment that it relies on.

Voluntary sustainability standards (VSSs) such as the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), ProTerra Foundation, and Organic have been working to address sustainability challenges in the soybean sector for the past 3 decades. They support and promote practices that can help soybean farmers and workers preserve vital ecosystems and build resilience to climate impacts.

Becoming certified can also help soybean farmers negotiate higher prices or premiums with buyers. But the processing and trading of soybeans are controlled by a few multinational companies that operate at a pinch point in the value chain. They can buy from a wide range of producers and sell to an equally wide range of consumers. These powerful actors hold all the power, whereas farmers bear most of the financial and environmental risks of production—as well as the costs of certification.

While pursuing certification can improve farmers’ productivity, help them save costs on inputs, and provide them with access to finance, more direct financial incentives are needed to motivate more farmers to get on board. This report provides recommendations for how governments, private sector actors, and standard-setting bodies can work together to reward farmers for using sustainable practices and better distribute the costs of production and certification throughout the value chain

Funded by

Report

A Sustainable Asset Valuation of the Tirana–Durres Railway in Albania

This report presents the economic valuation of the Tirana–Durres railway in Albania, including its investment costs, added benefits, and avoided costs. This Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) assessment shows that the project can lead to significant economic, social, and environmental benefits for the Tirana-Durres region, such as avoided vehicle operating costs, health benefits, and time saved.

February 20, 2024

The Tirana–Durres metropolitan region in Albania accommodates 37% of the country's population and accounts for 48% of the country's GDP. Despite being one of the most developed economic areas in the country, the region faces significant transportation challenges due to its reliance on road transport and an outdated railway network that has not received adequate investment or maintenance in the last 25 years. As a result, railway passenger and freight traffic has steadily declined over the years.

To address this problem, proposals have been made to rehabilitate the Tirana-Durres railway line and establish a new railway connection to Rinas International Airport, with the aim of improving Albania's railway transport and its economic performance by facilitating efficient passenger and trade movements while also reducing the use of polluting transport modes and decreasing carbon dioxide emissions.

This SAVi assessment analyzes the multiple economic, social, and environmental benefits that the Tirana–Durres railway will have in the region after it is rehabilitated. The assessment shows that the railway system would provide a more efficient, safe, accessible, and environmentally friendly mode of transportation in the region while delivering substantial monetary benefits.

Key findings include:

  • The Tirana–Durres railway is a highly profitable project, generating cumulative (2023–2053), discounted (3.5%) net benefits of EUR 415.51 million.
  • When accounting for the full range of added benefits and avoided costs to the region, the Tirana–Durres railway results in an integrated benefit-cost ratio of 4.79.
  • The greatest impact of the Tirana–Durres railway is the avoided vehicle operating costs that will result from the shift from road transport to the railway, followed by the health benefits from avoided air pollution costs and increased physical activity and time saved.
Report

A Sustainable Asset Valuation of a Net-Zero Transport Strategy in Indonesia

This Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) compares strategies for supporting the decarbonization of the transport sector and achieving net-zero targets by 2060 in Indonesia. Interventions such as investments in public transport, private vehicle electrification, teleworking, and decarbonization of the electricity supply are combined and assessed in different scenarios, revealing their economic, social and environmental benefits, costs, and trade-offs.

February 20, 2024

Indonesia, home to the fourth largest population in the world, is exposed to significant climate change risks, experiencing high air pollution levels and having much of its population in low-lying areas prone to flooding. At the same time, the country's population and urbanization rates are expected to significantly increase in the coming decades.

Indonesia's transport sector is the most energy intensive sector in the country, and among the most polluting. For this reason, transforming the transport sector is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency in the long term. The electrification of transport—coupled with a high renewable energy share in electricity generation and a shift from individual, motorized transport modes to public transport and non-motorized modes—could help to decarbonize the transport sector in Indonesia.

The public and private sectors in Indonesia both play significant roles in addressing the ever-increasing environmental challenges. National and regional governments can promote policies that support decarbonization and invest in public transport infrastructure, encouraging individuals to adopt more sustainable transport practices. Similarly, the private sector can support this through investing in and improving innovative electric vehicle technologies.

For this assessment, we considered and combined interventions from both the public and private sectors in Indonesia—investments in public transport, private vehicle electrification, teleworking, and decarbonization of the electricity supply—into net-zero transport strategies. We used our Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) methodology to assess and compare these strategies, demonstrating their economic, social, and environmental added benefits and avoided costs.

Key findings include:

  • Combining energy and transport reforms is critical to attaining net-zero transport in Indonesia by 2060; therefore, decarbonizing the energy supply should be an important component of any transport strategy.
  • Promoting strategies that combine the electrification of private vehicles with renewable energy sources and investments in public transport infrastructure yield the most substantial societal benefits, such as avoided traffic accidents costs, avoided carbon dioxide emissions, and avoided internal combustion emission vehicle costs.
  • The transformation of Indonesia's transport sector requires a collaborative approach that encourages behavioural shifts and promotes investments from both the public and private sectors.
  • Integrating health considerations into the broader framework of transport reforms enhances the overall impact on both societal well-being and economic efficiency.
Report

A Sustainable Asset Valuation of the FAME II policy in India

This Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) analyzes the second phase of the Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric (& Hybrid) Vehicles (FAME II) policy in India and demonstrates the economic, social, and environmental benefits and costs under different scenarios.

February 20, 2024

Cities in India face a variety of urban mobility and transport challenges, including long commuting times, safety concerns, air pollution, carbon dioxide emissions, and others. Simultaneously, the global automotive industry is facing an overhaul due to innovations in digitalization and automation. The electrification of transport vehicles is of particular importance, creating the potential to have a considerable impact in reducing vehicle pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, especially in the country's large metropolises.

To address some of these transport challenges, the Indian National Automotive Board (NAB) developed a funding scheme for electric vehicles (EVs) in order to create demand for those technologies. The second phase (II) of the scheme, titled Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric (& Hybrid) Vehicles in India (FAME II India), aims to support the electrification of public and shared transportation and is implemented via the use of subsidies provided directly by the National Government of India to urban authorities in Indian cities over a 5-year period. The total budget of FAME II is INR 100 billion INR (USD 1.2 billion).

This SAVi assessment uses a variety of models to estimate not only the investment costs (i.e., capital and operation and maintenance costs) but also the added environmental, social, and economic benefits and avoided costs of the FAME II policy in India, under different scenarios. The scenarios focus on how much of the total budget of the subsidy is allocated by the government for the promotion of electric vehicles (EVs) (subsidy) and what is the share of the cost of an EV that will be covered by the government subsidy and by the consumer (contribution).

The results show that the FAME II policy will stimulate economic growth and deliver considerable social and environmental benefits, such as avoided costs of internal combustion engine vehicles and fuel use, avoided costs of air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, and employment creation. In addition, the analysis shows how important is to find the right balance between reducing the government's subsidy contribution in order for a higher number of EVs to be subsidized and providing the right incentives for households and the private sector to buy EVs.