A Legally Sound Oil and Gas Phase-Out
How to design policies to mitigate investor–state arbitration risks
At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 28), governments agreed to transition away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner. Some governments are implementing this decision with plans to phase out oil and gas production. One of the barriers to phase-out policies is the threat of investor–state arbitration. This report provides policy-makers with tools to mitigate the legal risks of investor–state arbitration when designing oil and gas phase-out policies.
Recommendations
-
Based on our analysis of the decisions of arbitral tribunals, this report proposes five principles for policy-makers to follow: 1) no new licences, 2) manage expectations, 3) build broad authority, 4) use existing powers, and 5) be consistent.
In the global stocktake at COP 28, governments agreed to transition away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner. Several governments are taking action with plans to phase out oil and gas production. A managed phase-out is vital to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement and smooth the transition for oil- and gas-producing economies.
One barrier is the threat of investors suing governments through investor–state arbitration. Some governments have stated that this threat has led them to adopt less ambitious fossil fuel phase-out policies.
As more governments commit to phasing out oil and gas exploration and production, mitigation of the risks of investor–state arbitration becomes a key priority. These risks differ over time and depend on the targeted stage of the production cycle. The sooner governments act, the higher the chances of achieving 1.5°C and, crucially, the lower their legal risks. Conversely, governments that postpone phase-out measures make it harder to align fossil fuel production with the Paris goals and expose themselves to additional legal risks.
This report supports governments committed to the phase-out, particularly in developed countries. It provides policy-makers with tools to mitigate the legal risks of investor–state arbitration when designing and implementing policies to phase out oil and gas production.
You might also be interested in
Bonn Climate Talks 2026: What to expect after Santa Marta
With UN climate talks starting in Bonn soon, the shift to implementation is being felt, especially in the transition away from fossil fuels.
May 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
For the second month in a row, the United States has dominated new licensing activity, awarding 74 new exploration licences in April alone. If fully combusted this could emit 35.5 MtCO2.
Memorandum of Understanding Agreement Erodes Last Pillar of Canadian Climate Policy
The governments of Canada and Alberta have announced new details on an oil pipeline while significantly weakening the industrial carbon price. Doubling down on oil and gas while much of the world is transitioning away from fossil fuels sets Canada on a path toward greater economic risk and worsening climate impacts.
Weakening Canada's Industrial Carbon Price Raises Emissions With No Clear Economic Benefit
News today of a reported agreement between the federal and Alberta governments that the carbon price paid by industry may not reach CAD 130/tonne until 2040 would represent a significant and unnecessary watering down of the current industrial carbon price.