Taxing Coal to Hit the Goals: A simple way for Indonesia to reduce carbon emissions
-
An Indonesian coal tax of IDR 78,700 (USD 5.50) per tonne—as implemented in India—would generate around IDR 49 trillion (USD 3.6 billion) per year.
-
Indonesia’s coal-fired power stations cause 7,480 premature deaths per year from air pollution-related diseases—coal taxes should be increased to reflect these costs to society.
-
Coal accounts for 40% of Indonesia’s energy-related emissions—higher coal taxes are needed to encourage consumers and investors to switch to cleaner alternatives.
The Government of Indonesia is considering options for carbon pricing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon pricing is an effective and economically efficient way to reduce emissions, but details on operation and implementation could take years to resolve. As an interim and immediate measure, we recommend the government simply increase taxes on coal as a de facto form of carbon taxation. A coal tax would immediately cover 40% of Indonesia’s energy-related emissions, be relatively easy to administer (applying to one fuel at one rate), and generate significant revenue. A tax of IDR 78,700 (USD 5.50) per tonne of coal—equivalent to a carbon tax of around IDR 32,000 (USD 2.20) per tonne CO2—would generate around IDR 49 trillion (USD 3.6 billion) per year. The revenue could be used to compensate vulnerable households and sectors for higher energy prices, encourage investment in clean energy, and assist coal workers and communities.
India has demonstrated that such a tax is politically and economically feasible. Like Indonesia, India has a large domestic coal industry, substantial electricity subsidies, significant poverty, and rapidly growing electricity demand. Despite these challenges, India imposed a coal “cess” (special tax) in 2010, which is now equivalent to USD 5.50 per tonne and raised USD 3.7 billion in 2019. A special coal tax in Indonesia would help deliver the government’s goals to reduce carbon emissions and toxic air pollution, promote renewable energy, and increase revenue.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Governments are subsidizing the destruction of nature even as they promise to protect it
When dignitaries from 196 countries converge in Montreal next week to rub shoulders and hash out a new global agreement to save nature, money will be on the agenda.
The USD 1.2 Trillion Problem: Why every energy crisis strengthens the case for clean public finance
Public financial flows including subsidies, state-owned enterprise investments, and international public finance remain fundamentally misaligned with climate and energy security goals, and leaving households and businesses vulnerable to global fossil fuel markets, new analysis finds.
Governments Spent Five Times More Public Money on Fossil Fuels than Renewables
New analysis finds that in 2024, public financial support for fossil fuels exceeded USD 1.2 trillion, compared with USD 254 billion for clean energy—meaning fossil fuels still received around five times more public support than renewables.
World’s Top Fossil Fuel Importers Spent USD 314 Billion Subsidizing Fossil Fuels in 2024
By prioritizing fossil fuels over clean energy by a margin of 2.5 to 1, the world’s largest economies are subsidizing their own vulnerability to geopolitical crises by choosing to lock in high-risk, volatile energy systems instead of investing in lasting stability.