Nordic Environmental Fiscal Reform
Case studies and application for post-pandemic economic recovery
The Nordics have successfully decoupled economic growth from GHG emissions, e.g. Sweden’s GDP grew by 125% while GHG emissions fell by 27% between 1990 and 2019.
Environmental fiscal reform fostered the Danish wind energy industry, which now employs over 33,000 direct employees and accounts for 7% of Denmark’s exports.
Environmental taxes generated between USD 7 billion and USD 13 billion in each Nordic country (except Iceland) in 2018.
Over the coming decade, governments will need to recover from the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic while responding to the growing impacts of climate change. Environmental fiscal reform (EFR)—the alignment of taxes, subsidies and spending with positive environmental outcomes—provides a means of addressing both these challenges by raising revenues (for debt reduction and stimulus spending), while creating price signals to deter carbon and other pollution.
Nordic countries have deep experience with EFR, having pioneered the use of carbon taxes as an environmental and economic recovery tool in response to financial crises in the 1990s and 2008. The Nordics also tax energy, transport, air pollution, and waste. While national policies vary, the Nordics have generally used environmental tax revenues to fund reductions in taxes that are a drag on the economy, finance green stimulus to boost productivity, and provide a price signal to encourage energy efficiency while discouraging pollution. Using existing literature, this brief examines the effect of Nordic EFR on five key indicators: economic growth, employment, revenues, air pollution, and carbon emissions. A Nordic case study is provided for each indicator.
This brief also describes how experience from the Nordics can apply to developing and emerging economies, despite differences in country circumstances.
You might also be interested in
Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform and Taxation: Tools for a green recovery
Joachim Roth suggests two key ways to fund energy transitions during the COVID-19 recovery: fossil fuel subsidy reform and green taxation.
The Disparity Between Climate Commitments and Spending
Are governments missing a historic opportunity to fund green transitions? How has the pandemic affected the energy system? Tom Moerenhout explains.
Five Key Principles for a Fossil-Free Recovery
Lourdes Sanchez, lead author of Achieving a Fossil-Free Recovery, explains how the COVID-19 pandemic has created a window of opportunity to fund a green recovery, along with five principles to do so.
Achieving a Fossil-Free Recovery
This report lays out concrete options for governments to achieve net-zero and sustainable development goals by using recovery spending to support the transition to clean energy and a resilient, fossil-free economy.