Report Calls on Fossil Fuel Producers to Map “Transition Away” in NDCs
The next round of national climate plans due in 2025 must reflect the global stocktake outcome
June 13, 2024 — As interim climate talks draw to a close in Bonn, Germany, attention is turning to national action. Governments are due to submit the next generation of national climate plans, or NDCs, in 2025. These will be the first since the international agreement at COP 28 to transition away from fossil fuels.
Experts from the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) have analyzed the last round of NDCs from the top 20 biggest fossil fuel-producing countries (FF20): Algeria, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Together, these account for 93% of global coal production, 80% of oil, and 77% of gas.
They found a third (seven) of the FF20 make no mention of fossil fuel production in their NDCs. Six stated an intention to continue or increase production. Only one, the EU, representing coal producers Germany and Poland, mentioned a pathway to decrease production.
Natalie Jones, policy advisor at IISD, says, “The science is clear: there is no room for new fossil fuel infrastructure in any credible pathway to Paris goals, and fossil fuel production and consumption must be rapidly phased out. The time is now for fossil fuel-producing countries to align their climate plans with what the world urgently needs.”
The report identifies five elements governments can include in NDCs and long-term strategies to reflect the outcome of the global stocktake at COP 28:
- Information on national fossil fuel production, future production plans, reserves, and support.
- Targets and pathways to wind down fossil fuel production. This could be in the form of a commitment to reduce or phase out fossil fuel production by a target date.
- Policies and measures to disincentivize or constrain fossil fuel production, for example, moratoriums on development, production and export caps, reform of production subsidies, and increased taxes on extraction.
- Policies and measures to support workers and communities in the transition and diversify the economy away from fossil fuel production.
- Information related to equity and international support and cooperation.
Paola Yanguas Parra, policy advisor at IISD, says, "In a world that has agreed to transition away from fossil fuels, producers that keep mining and drilling are vulnerable to market shocks. NDCs and long-term strategies can be used to guide an orderly transition and attract investment into alternative growth sectors.”
Notes for editors
- How transition away from fossil fuel production can be included in third-generation NDCs and LT-LEDS
- COP 28 Agreement Signals “Beginning of the End” of the Fossil Fuel Era (UN Climate Change press release)
- No New Fossil Fuel Projects: The logical first step in a transition to clean energy
Media Contact
Megan Darby, senior communications officer, IISD: [email protected]
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a globally recognized think tank with 3 decades of experience working to solve the world’s most pressing sustainable development challenges. We combine deep expertise in a wide range of issues with a collaborative approach to research, policy advice, and hands-on support to ensure these solutions are brought to life. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, we are a diverse team of over 300 professionals working from offices in Canada, Switzerland, and other locations around the world.
You might also be interested in
Bonn Climate Talks: What to watch for the fossil fuel transition
As governments return to Bonn for the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies meetings (SB64), the transition away from fossil fuels will be a key test of whether growing political momentum can translate into practical progress.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.