Options to Incorporate Circular Economy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements
-
Some trading blocs have started including circular economy provisions in their RTAs—with the European Union taking the lead—but so far these references remain largely embryonic.
-
Circular economy-related provisions may be integrated into horizontal chapters (e.g., on environment or sustainable development, trade in goods, services, subsidies, investment, or government procurement) by making specific references to circularity.
-
Circular economy objectives can also be reflected in dedicated sectoral chapters or stand-alone annexes or included as specific annexes attached to broader chapters (e.g., technical barriers to trade).
Many countries and economic blocs are beginning to embark on transforming their economies into a circular model. This transition entails a deep paradigm shift set to address the triple crises of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, and the unsustainable use of natural resources. In today’s globally connected economy, international trade will play a critical role in this equation by exploiting comparative advantages and economies of scale. Cross-border exchanges of goods and services related to the circular economy already occur at all stages of the value chain, including upstream services related to circular design, goods for refurbishment and remanufacturing, and trade in waste and secondary materials.
Governments can use a range of trade-related policy measures, including tariff and non-tariff measures, to encourage the transition away from the take–make–waste economic model. Regional trade agreements, among other mechanisms, can be a vehicle for cooperation on the trade and circular economy interface between specific trading partners. The European Union, for example, has a Circular Economy Action Plan, which will require mainstreaming circular economy objectives in its free trade agreements. As a contribution to this emerging debate, this policy brief explores possible options to incorporate circular economy-related provisions in trade agreements based on existing precedents.
You might also be interested in
Integrating Sustainability Standards in South–South Trade Policies Can Improve Producers' Livelihoods in Developing Countries, New Report Shows
Trade between developing countries and regions—known as "South–South trade"—is growing rapidly. In the past couple of decades, its value has grown almost tenfold, from USD 600 billion in 1995 to USD 5.3 trillion in 2021. A new report from the International Institute for Sustainable Development explores how governments in developing countries are using voluntary sustainability standards in their trade policies to ensure this growth benefits small-scale producers, communities, and the environment.
Sustainability Initiatives Falling Short for Sugar Cane Farmers in Developing Countries
Sugar cane is considered one of the most valuable agricultural commodities in the world and provides livelihoods for more than 100 million people in 120 countries. But many sugar cane farmers in developing countries live in poverty—and initiatives aimed at supporting them are falling short of their potential. A new report from the International Institute for Sustainable Development explores recent market trends in the sugar cane sector, what these trends mean for producers in developing countries, and what voluntary sustainability standards, governments, and private sector actors can do to improve farmers' incomes.
South-South Trade and Voluntary Sustainability Standards
This report explores how voluntary sustainability standards are being used in trade policy to increase the trade of more sustainable products between developing countries.
Global Market Report: Sugar cane prices and sustainability
This report explores recent market trends in the sugar cane sector, what these trends mean for producers in developing countries, and what can be done to improve farmers' incomes.