Options to Incorporate Circular Economy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements
This report explores ways in which trade policy can further support a transition to a more circular economy using regional trade agreements (RTAs) as a vehicle. In doing so, it suggests possible options to incorporate circular economy-related provisions in future RTAs, building on precedents with similar objectives in agreements currently in force or under negotiation.
-
Some trading blocs have started including circular economy provisions in their RTAs—with the European Union taking the lead—but so far these references remain largely embryonic.
-
Circular economy-related provisions may be integrated into horizontal chapters (e.g., on environment or sustainable development, trade in goods, services, subsidies, investment, or government procurement) by making specific references to circularity.
-
Circular economy objectives can also be reflected in dedicated sectoral chapters or stand-alone annexes or included as specific annexes attached to broader chapters (e.g., technical barriers to trade).
Many countries and economic blocs are beginning to embark on transforming their economies into a circular model. This transition entails a deep paradigm shift set to address the triple crises of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, and the unsustainable use of natural resources. In today’s globally connected economy, international trade will play a critical role in this equation by exploiting comparative advantages and economies of scale. Cross-border exchanges of goods and services related to the circular economy already occur at all stages of the value chain, including upstream services related to circular design, goods for refurbishment and remanufacturing, and trade in waste and secondary materials.
Governments can use a range of trade-related policy measures, including tariff and non-tariff measures, to encourage the transition away from the take–make–waste economic model. Regional trade agreements, among other mechanisms, can be a vehicle for cooperation on the trade and circular economy interface between specific trading partners. The European Union, for example, has a Circular Economy Action Plan, which will require mainstreaming circular economy objectives in its free trade agreements. As a contribution to this emerging debate, this policy brief explores possible options to incorporate circular economy-related provisions in trade agreements based on existing precedents.
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
From Subsidies to Sustainability
Examining how agricultural subsidy reform across sub-Saharan African countries can promote soil health, equity, climate resilience, and sustainability.