Carbon Minefields: Oil and gas exploration is surging to pre-Covid levels
Despite agreeing to transition away from fossil fuels, governments are licensing new fields.
July 24, 2024 — Oil and gas exploration is booming despite an agreement at last year’s COP 28 climate summit to transition away from fossil fuels.
Experts at the International Institute for Sustainable Development analyzed global data collated by the research company Rystad. They found:
- Resources discovered in 2024 threaten to unleash 12 billion tonnes of CO2 if fully exploited—more than the past 4 years’ discoveries combined.
- Rich countries (the United States, Canada, Australia, Norway, and the United Kingdom) have issued two thirds of the global number of oil and gas licences since 2020.
- China, Mexico, and Russia are set to license the biggest volumes of oil and gas in the second half of 2024.
- Companies spent an estimated USD 26.2 billion looking for more oil and gas in newly awarded and discovered fields over the past 12 months. Equinor, Shell, and BP were the biggest investors.
- If all licensed fields are fully exploited, the world will extract more than twice as much oil and gas in 2040 as is compatible with a 1.5°C global warming limit. The “production gap” is widening at its highest rate since 2015.
- There is no room for new oil and gas fields under a 1.5°C global warming limit, peer-reviewed research shows.
Olivier Bois von Kursk, policy advisor at IISD, says, “Ending oil and gas licensing is a logical next step in the transition to clean energy. Governments need to put the COP 28 agreement into practice—particularly those with the wealth to drive investment into more sustainable sectors."
IISD is launching the Carbon Minefields newsletter to track the climate impact of global oil and gas licensing and capex data on a monthly basis.
Eduardo Posada, policy analyst at IISD, says: “AI allows us to analyze these huge datasets faster than before. We hope the Carbon Minefields newsletter will be a valuable tool to hold governments and companies to account for delivering on climate agreements.”
Notes for Editors
- July Edition | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
- No New Fossil Fuel Projects: The logical first step in a transition to clean energy
- How the Transition Away From Fossil Fuel Production Can Be Included in New Climate Commitments and Plans
- COP 28 Agreement Signals “Beginning of the End” of the Fossil Fuel Era (UN Climate Change press release)
Media Contact
Megan Darby, Senior Communications Officer, IISD: [email protected]
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is a globally recognized think tank with 3 decades of experience working to solve the world’s most pressing sustainable development challenges. We combine deep expertise in a wide range of issues with a collaborative approach to research, policy advice, and hands-on support to ensure these solutions are brought to life. Headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, we are a diverse team of over 300 professionals working from offices in Canada, Switzerland, and other locations around the world.
You might also be interested in
Bonn Climate Talks 2026: What to expect after Santa Marta
With UN climate talks starting in Bonn soon, the shift to implementation is being felt, especially in the transition away from fossil fuels.
May 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
For the second month in a row, the United States has dominated new licensing activity, awarding 74 new exploration licences in April alone. If fully combusted this could emit 35.5 MtCO2.
April 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
In March 2026, 91 oil and gas exploration licences were awarded across three countries, giving companies access to resources that would emit an estimated 93.1 MtCO2 if burned.
World’s Top Fossil Fuel Importers Spent USD 314 Billion Subsidizing Fossil Fuels in 2024
By prioritizing fossil fuels over clean energy by a margin of 2.5 to 1, the world’s largest economies are subsidizing their own vulnerability to geopolitical crises by choosing to lock in high-risk, volatile energy systems instead of investing in lasting stability.