How the Transition Away From Fossil Fuel Production Can Be Included in New Climate Commitments and Plans
Governments are due to submit their third nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in 2025. These will be the first since the landmark agreement at COP 28 to transition away from fossil fuels. This report analyzes how fossil fuel production has appeared in NDCs to date and suggests ways for countries to reflect the transition away from fossil fuel production in their third-generation NDCs.
-
New NDCs and LT-LEDS must tackle not only the use of fossil fuels, but also fossil fuel production in a way that is aligned with the #COP28 global stocktake agreement to transition away from fossil fuels in a just, orderly, and equitable manner.
-
One third of the 20 biggest fossil fuel producing countries do not mention transition of the fossil fuel sector in their NDCs, and more than half have not submitted an LT-LEDS or do not mention fossil fuels in their LT-LEDS.
-
Countries can include several elements in their third-generation NDCs and LT-LEDS to reflect the #COP28 agreement to transition away from fossil fuels, including targets, pathways, policies and measures to wind down fossil fuel production, and policies and measures for just transition and economic diversification.
At COP 28, countries reached a landmark agreement to transition away from fossil fuels. Ahead of COP 30 in 2025, countries are expected to submit their third generation of NDCs. These should reflect the COP 28 agreement to transition away from fossil fuels. Meeting the Paris Agreement goals while avoiding an unnecessarily abrupt and disruptive transition away from fossil fuels requires that governments plan for a managed phase-out of fossil fuel production. Countries have a timely opportunity to reflect this in their next-generation NDCs as well as their long-term low-emissions development strategies (LT-LEDS).
This report analyzes the last round of NDCs from the top 20 biggest fossil-fuel-producing countries: Algeria, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. Together, these account for 93% of global coal production, 80% of oil, and 77% of gas.
A third of the NDCs make no mention of fossil fuel production, while six stated an intention to continue or increase production. Only one, the EU, representing coal producers Germany and Poland, mentioned a pathway to decrease production.
The report identifies five elements governments can include in NDCs and LT-LEDS to reflect the outcome of the global stocktake at COP 28:
- information on national fossil fuel production, future production plans, reserves, and support
- targets and pathways to wind down fossil fuel production. This could be in the form of a commitment to reduce or phase out fossil fuel production by a target date
- policies and measures to disincentivize or constrain fossil fuel production, for example, moratoriums on development and production and export caps, reform of production subsidies, and increased taxes on extraction
- policies and measures to support workers and communities in the transition and diversify the economy away from fossil fuel production
- information related to equity and international support and cooperation
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Senegal's Big LNG Gamble
This report explores Senegal's nascent liquefied nitrogen gas (LNG) industry by assessing the impacts associated with a new fossil fuel-based industry on the country's environment, economy, and society. It does this by responding to three questions: What have been the impacts of the development of LNG on Senegal to date? Is it viable for Senegal to invest further into an industry that is projected to decline? What risks can Senegal expect should it forge ahead with its LNG development plans?
Border Carbon Adjustment Mechanisms and Impacts on Vietnam
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of stakeholders from Vietnam on border carbon adjustment (BCA) schemes to contribute to the global debate on BCA good practices.
Model Inter Se Agreement to Neutralize the Survival Clause of the Energy Charter Treaty Between the EU and Other non-EU Contracting Parties
An analysis of how the European Union (EU) and other contracting parties of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) could modify the treaty among themselves to neutralize the survival clause and prevent future fossil fuel investment arbitrations.
The United Kingdom's Strategy for Carbon Border Adjustment in a Changing Global Landscape
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of United Kingdom stakeholders on its proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to contribute to the global debate on international principles and best practices for national border carbon adjustment schemes.