Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2015-2016
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, reflecting the year ending March 31, 2016.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, reflecting the year ending March 31, 2016.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, reflecting the year ending March 31, 2017.
The Consolidated Financial Statements of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, reflecting the year ending March 31, 2018.
This report provides an overview of APEC economies’ existing measures on withdrawal of subsidies in cases of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, drawing on the voluntary responses and input of member economies. It identifies potential elements of good practice by analyzing and comparing the different ways through which the withdrawal of subsidies from IUU fishers has been implemented domestically by individual APEC economies or under regional schemes (the EU, CPTPP and USMCA).
Description provided by the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
This report explores the ways in which disruptive technologies can help food and agriculture systems worldwide deal with three complex challenges.
First, demand for nutritious food continues to rise globally. Second, food and agriculture systems are having to adapt to changing weather and ecological conditions while reducing the harm they cause to the environment. Third, farmers and farmworkers face economic precarity and vulnerability, with too many living in poverty and chronic hunger. The challenges are immense, but there are technologies that can make a positive difference.
This report looks at innovations in three areas of technology, particularly how the declining costs and increased availability of renewable energy can make a difference. The authors also analyzed how off-grid electrification using solar photovoltaics (PV), dramatic improvements in battery capacity and performance, and the data revolution in information and communication technology (ICT) can each strengthen the resilience and sustainability of food and agriculture systems in low-and middle-income countries.
The National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process assists governments in identifying their medium- and long-term adaptation needs, and developing the right strategies to address them.
Though the NAP process remains a government-led and country-owned process, an effective NAP process is inclusive, participatory, and should involve a variety of stakeholder groups, including the private sector.
This toolkit aims to help governments develop strategies for the effective engagement of private sector actors in the NAP process. This includes engaging them in all phases of the NAP process, as outlined in the Technical Guidelines for the NAP Process, developed in 2012 by the Least Developed Countries Expert Group (LEG) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The guiding document is not prescriptive; what works in one context may not work in another, and, as such, users should adopt those methods and approaches most relevant to their national or local realities.
The NAP Global Network and the UNFCCC Adaptation Committee co-hosted a webinar that demonstrated the versatile nature of the toolkit, as well as its applicability. Watch the video and view the presentations here.
Key Messages
The reasons to set and apply "green strings" are clear:
The following seven “green strings” should be attached to COVID-19 recovery measures announced by Canada’s government:
We can no longer continue with the status quo, worsening the climate and biodiversity crises and locking our country and the global community in to stark health, environmental, and economic outcomes. We must seize this difficult moment to transform our economy and our institutions to serve vital public policy goals from environment to equity. The stakes are high.
The SAVi results suggest that the hydropower assets cannot be considered a preferable solution to generate electricity for the Albanian people as they cause higher costs to communities, the environment and the state than they generate benefits.
Key Messages
The Sustainable Asset Valuation (SAVi) was applied to the hydropower projects Poçem and Kalivaç to calculate the costs of environmental, social and economic externalities caused by these two projects currently being developed on the Vjosa River. The assessment also sought to calculate how these projects perform if climate change risks materialize. The assessment results presented in this report inform the public debate on the environmental and societal costs of hydropower and shed light on economic concerns of hydropower performance. Results are compared to the performance of a hypothetical solar PV system and a hypothetical onshore wind farm.
Read the digital story Why Albania Should Shift Away From Hydropower and Preserve the Last Free-Flowing River in Europe
The SAVi results demonstrate that the two hydro assets imply considerable trade-offs. These emerge because of adverse effects on communities, economic sectors (such as agriculture and tourism), and ecosystems along the Vjosa River. Results of the cost-benefit analysis amount to negative EUR 233 million and negative EUR 321 million for the assets Poçem and Kalivaç, respectively.
The same conclusions can be drawn from assessing the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). Under conventional calculations, the cost per MWh of electricity would be between EUR 121 (Poçem) and almost EUR 158 (Kalivaç). When integrating the valued externalities into the LCOE, the cost per MWh of electricity would increase to EUR 184 and EUR 203, respectively. If the impacts of materialized climate change risks are taken into account, the integrated LCOEs of both hydro assets increase further.
The financial analysis results of the two hydro assets highlight that supplying electricity to the domestic market alone will not be sufficient to make the assets financially attractive because of a market environment that promises relatively low electricity offtake prices. This is indicated by a project internal rate of return (IRR) for both hydro assets of 9.32% in a conventional scenario, which is below the assumed hurdle rate of 13.5%. The project IRR drops to 3.15% if the calculated costs for sediment dredging are considered and turns negative if the monetary value of externalities is internalized.
This report examines how voluntary sustainability standards are performing in the cotton sector.
Key Messages
Cotton is the most widely used natural fibre in textiles, accounting for one third of total fibres manufactured worldwide. The sector faces a variety of sustainability issues, such as low farm prices, often due to unfavourable trade terms, excessive water consumption, pesticide use, and the use of forced labour. Cotton producers are increasingly using voluntary sustainability standards to address the sector’s sustainability challenges.
This report is the seventh in IISD’s Sustainable Commodities Marketplace Series, which presents market information and analysis on agricultural commodities to foster transparency, knowledge, and strategic decision making for sustainable development.
This paper presents four best practice case studies and key ingredients of procurement reform to enable the shift toward strategic public procurement for sustainable development.
Key Messages
This publication builds on the Handbook for the Inter-American Network on Government Procurement (INGP): Implementing Sustainable Public Procurement in Latin America and the Caribbean (Casier et al., 2015). It aims to provide guidance to the INGP network for taking the next step on Sustainable Public Procurement.
The 10 key ingredients for strategic public procurement reform are: