Life Cycle Costing in Sustainable Public Procurement: A Question of Value
Life-cycle costing (LCC) moves beyond the purchase price of a good or service, to also include all other significant cost flows over the entire life period of a product or service. More specifically, LCC analysis thus also includes operating costs, end-of-life costs and the longevity and warranty time frames of the assets. Through this report IISD finds that, although many procurers have been using LCC as a decision-making tool, its use is not yet systematic. This observation leads to the conclusion that procurement policies, even sustainable public procurement ones, are suboptimal. A total of 24 issues are identified and discussed in this report.
The fact that LCC is not yet considered a critical component of sustainable public procurement emerges due to a number of factors. Among others, budgetary decisions based on life-cycle costing may imply higher up-front costs, which is often unattractive for governments who want to make procurement decisions based on the lowest possible costs. In the same vein, compared to financial returns, socioeconomic gains from procurement decisions are often not factored in sufficiently. However, the higher initial costs of using LCC are related to a number of non-budgetary causes. There are, for example, still many research gaps in the application of LCC. Similarly, a lack of competence in conducting LCC, and insufficient tools and data to do it properly, make its use much less attractive.
A lack of motivation to use LCC often arises from the fact that financial gains or long-term benefits from its use will likely occur after the original procurement decision maker's time in office. Therefore, LCC should become part of public expenditure policy. This requires a build-up of capacities, tools, platforms and expertise to do LCC properly. It also demands an understanding that higher investments may be necessary to reach success. In this regard, it could be useful if organizations are allowed to retain some savings achieved through SPP to invest back into new initiatives.
You might also be interested in
Guidance Handbook for the Revised Common Investment Area
A practical guide to help member states of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) translate the revised Common Investment Area (CCIA) Agreement into national legal and institutional action.
Spending Public Money Smarter for Energy Security
Four energy-importing countries show how public financial support for clean energy can reduce exposure to fossil fuel price shocks.
From Patchwork to Production
Canadian waters hold some of the world's most promising offshore wind resources, but incomplete and fragmented regulations threaten to leave that potential stranded. Getting the rules right is now a strategic imperative.
Making Electric Vehicles Work for More People
At least seven of the 21 BRICS+ economies are directing subsidies toward electric vehicles (EVs) and transport services widely used by lower- and middle-income people—from two- and three-wheelers to buses and shared transport.