Designed to Fail
How fossil fuel infrastructure undermines municipal finances
Low-density, car-oriented growth typically imposes long-term fiscal burdens on municipal governments while locking in higher energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. This research examines how urban development patterns shape municipal finances and emissions outcomes in the context of growing infrastructure deficits and increasing pressure to meet climate targets.
Recommendations
-
Align infrastructure pricing with actual costs: Property taxes, development charges, and user fees should better reflect the true long-term costs of infrastructure so that communities have a clearer understanding of the full costs of infrastructure.
-
Require stronger fiscal impact analyses (FIAs): Municipalities should require full life-cycle FIAs for major infrastructure projects, including long-term maintenance and emissions costs, alongside spatial analysis that evaluates the fiscal performance of different development patterns.
-
Tie provincial and federal infrastructure funding to long-term sustainability: Senior government infrastructure funding should prioritize projects that demonstrate long-term fiscal viability and support lower-emission development patterns.
Significant infrastructure deficits in municipalities across North America indicate that infrastructure is being expanded at an unsustainable rate. At the same time, governments are faced with the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
This report examines how urban development patterns influence both the fiscal and environmental costs of car-oriented infrastructure. Low-density growth patterns often generate insufficient tax revenue to cover their full life-cycle infrastructure costs, contributing to long-term municipal liabilities, while also reinforcing car dependency and higher emissions. The research explores how fiscal impact analysis, infrastructure planning, and land-use policy can be better integrated to support more financially and environmentally sustainable development outcomes.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Five Reasons Climate Change Adaptation Is a Challenge for Rural Canada
Canada needs to build resilience to the impacts of climate change through planned adaptation, but barriers remain, especially for rural communities.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.