Beyond Fossil Fuels: Indonesia's fiscal transition
This report explores how Indonesia taxes and subsidizes the production and consumption of oil, gas, coal and electricity now; and what lies ahead.
Key Messages
- Government revenues from fossil fuel production are in rapid decline. Transition away from tax and non-tax revenues from oil, gas and coal extraction in Indonesia requires a transparent and comprehensive discussion.
- The use of government revenues from upstream oil & gas is trapped by subsidies to fuel & electricity consumption. These subsidies are an inefficient mechanism for redistribution of the declining export rents from fossil fuels.
- Revenues from the taxation of fossil fuel production and consumption as well as savings from subsidy reforms should be invested in productive uses supporting social development and economic diversification. Investments in renewable energy can be one of the sectors driving diversification of the Indonesian economy and its fiscal transition away from fossil fuels.
Indonesia is one of the few developing countries that can boast of reducing fiscal dependence on revenues from fossil fuel production while growing and diversifying both the economy and government revenue base. Since the beginning of the 21st century, Indonesia experienced a drop in government revenues from upstream oil and gas—from 35 per cent of the total revenues (7 per cent of GDP) in 2001 to just 6 per cent (less than 1 per cent of GDP) in 2016. Meanwhile, Indonesia’s rates of GDP growth (at 3–4 per cent per year) and budget deficit (at 2–3 per cent) remained largely unchanged.
However, the country faces several challenges in moving further towards a fiscal system supporting clean energy and a sustainable economy. Compared with other BRIICS countries, Indonesia underutilizes the fiscal space it can create by taxing energy consumption. Fuel consumption taxes (VAT and motor fuel tax) generate just a third of the value of fuel and electricity subsidies (0.57 per cent of GDP vs. 1.7 per cent of GDP on annual average over 2014–2016). These subsidies are an inefficient mechanism for redistribution of the declining export rents from fossil fuels. A lot of barriers remain in the way of renewable energy development.
This publication makes a first attempt at an integrated analysis of how Indonesia both taxes and subsidizes production and consumption of oil, gas, coal and electricity (most of which is generated with coal). The paper also explores lessons learned from Indonesia’s reduction of fiscal dependence on fossil fuels. Chapter 1 reviews the state of play in the oil, gas and coal sectors and in particular the role of state-owned enterprises. Chapter 2 focuses on the dynamics of government revenue from fossil fuels vs. its expenditure on fuel and electricity subsidies. Chapter 3 looks at the Indonesian policies linked to economic diversification.
The paper is a sister publication of the forthcoming IISD analysis Beyond Fossil Fuels: Fiscal Transitions in BRIICS and follows the same methodology.
Participating experts
Additional downloads
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
IISD Submission to the Belém Mission to 1.5
This submission is made in response to the invitation from the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) 29, COP 30, and COP 31 Presidencies on the Belém Mission to 1.5.