IISD Trade and Sustainability Review, March 2025
Fisheries Subsidies
This edition of the IISD Trade and Sustainability Review features four insights from experts on fisheries subsidies. The authors examine the current state of play on this issue at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and highlight the urgent need to establish effective rules to curb harmful subsidies that fuel overfishing and threaten both marine ecosystems and coastal communities around the world.
Read previous issues of the Trade and Sustainability Review here.
First Steps of a Long Journey: Rethinking fisheries subsidies for a sustainable future
In this edition of the IISD Trade and Sustainability Review, we delve into the critical and multifaceted issue of fisheries subsidies. Over the last few years, governments have worked hard to better align these public support measures with sustainable development objectives through global rulemaking. Significant results were achieved, but the journey has just begun.
Fishing and related activities are crucial to the lives of hundreds of millions of people worldwide, with many coastal communities relying on healthy marine resources for their basic income and food. But overfishing, often fuelled by government subsidies, threatens these livelihoods. We asked the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD's) Claire Delpeuch, Will Symes, and James Innes to shed light on why it is so important for government support policies to encourage fisheries that are environmentally sustainable, economically viable, and socially inclusive, and to share insights on how this can be achieved in light of the OECD's recently released data on public support measures.
Almost 25 years ago, governments decided to address the subsidized overexploitation of fisheries resources by negotiating global subsidy rules at the World Trade Organization (WTO). A critical milestone was achieved with the adoption of the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies—known in trade circles as "Fish 1"—in June 2022. The agreement is now approaching entry into force, and WTO members are negotiating a set of additional, broader disciplines, known as "Fish 2."
So where are we, exactly, in that process? My own article examines the current state of play in WTO work on fisheries subsidies and highlights a few key considerations moving forward. The current situation also begs the question of why additional rules are needed if a global agreement was already concluded in 2022. In a separate piece, Anna Holl Buhl (World Wildlife Fund) and Megan Jungwiwattanaporn (The Pew Charitable Trusts) highlight the significant added value that a Fish 2 agreement would bring to promoting global fisheries sustainability and argue that the upcoming United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice, France, is the perfect opportunity for the global community to strengthen its resolve in tackling harmful fisheries subsidies.
While the conclusion of global, binding rules is promising, the effectiveness of these disciplines will ultimately rely on the way governments implement them. This edition concludes with an insightful interview with ocean conservation expert Mamadou Diallo. He explains why Senegal’s ratification of the Fish 1 agreement was essential and provides key perspectives on the potential implementation challenges and the technical assistance developing countries will need to ensure the agreement is effectively implemented and genuinely benefits coastal communities and small-scale fishers.
Happy reading,
Tristan Irschlinger
Senior Policy Advisor, IISD
Articles
Government Support to Fisheries: Why should we care?
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) Claire Delpeuch, Will Symes, and James Innes explain why, when implemented, public support policies should be environmentally sustainable, economically viable, and socially inclusive, and share insights on how that objective can be met.
Read article here.
Fisheries Subsidies and the WTO: How far have we come?
Tristan Irschlinger offers a comprehensive overview explaining key aspects of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, ongoing discussions, and what’s at stake for the sustainability of global fisheries.
Read article here.
World Trade Organization Members: Don't abandon the race—finish negotiations on fisheries subsidies
Anna Holl Buhl and Megan Jungwiwattanaporn explain why broader rules are needed to phase out subsidies that incentivize overfishing, harm marine life, and threaten the communities that depend on them.
Read article here.
Fisheries Subsidies and Sustainability: What's at stake for Senegal?
Interview with Mamadou Diallo
In this interview, Senegalese expert Mamadou Diallo discusses the risk of overfishing and its impact on coastal communities, highlighting the importance of Senegal ratifying and implementing the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies.
Read article here.
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Strait of Hormuz Closure: Implications for African trade resilience
David Beer explores how the crisis in the Middle East is impacting African supply chains, while considering how the continent could turn this disruption into lasting gains for regional trade.
How the Hormuz Blockade Hit Asia
William George and Lynn Hughes assess how China, Japan, and Vietnam are navigating the fallout of the Strait of Hormuz closure and what it reveals about the state of energy security across Asia.