Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform in India: Cash transfers for PDS kerosene and domestic LPG
This report explores issues around supporting kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) subsidy reform with a direct cash transfer for the poor in India.
The Government of India spent over US$ 9 billion subsidizing fuel products - diesel, kerosene, LPG and, to a lesser extent, gasoline - in 2010-11. The Government's total subsidy expenditure (including for food and fertilizer) increased by nearly 27% in 2011-12, significantly contributing to the deterioration of India's fiscal balance. In addition, national oil companies incurred over US$ 8 billion worth of under-recoveries.
The Government has announced its goal of reducing total subsidy expenditure to 2% of GDP in 2012-13, with further reductions down to 1.75% in following years. Yet reform has been hampered by legitimate concerns over how higher fuel prices will affect the broader economy—potentially disrupting key sectors like transport, industry and agriculture—and the ability of poor citizens to cope with higher prices.
The International Institute for Sustainable Development's Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI), in collaboration with Delhi-based research institutes the National Institute for Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP) and The Energy Resource Institute (TERI), have evaluated the impacts of phasing out diesel, LPG and PDS kerosene subsidies and examined cash-transfer schemes as a means to support poor citizens transition to higher fuel prices.
The research comprises the following reports:
- Diesel Pricing in India: Entangled in a Policy Maze (PDF - 1.22 MB), published by NIPFP, analyzes the inflationary impacts of increasing diesel prices on the economy and on key groups. It provides recommendations and actions on how pricing mechanisms and taxation could be changed.
- Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform in India: Cash transfers for PDS kerosene and Domestic LPG (PDF - 1.62 MB), authored by TERI, provides recommendations for designing and implementing direct cash transfers in India. (To be published on 21 August 2012)
- India's Fuel Subsidies: Policy Recommendations for Reform (PDF - 744 KB) , authored by IISD, summarizes the research from the previous two reports, and highlights the key policy recommendations. (To be published on 21 August 2012)
In addition, the IISD has produced a 6-page Questions and Answers document that distils the key findings and recommendations, available here (PDF - 338 KB).
For more background information about India's energy subsidies, see:
A Citizens' Guide to Energy Subsidies in India
The views expressed in these reports do not necessarily reflect those of the GSI's funders, nor should they be attributed to them.
You might also be interested in
Canada, a giant oil producer, urges others to end fossil fuel subsidies
Canada is pushing the United States and other major economies to follow through on pledges to phase out "inefficient" fossil fuel subsidies, which have soared despite the growing threat of climate change. Such subsidies hit records last year, according to several watchdog groups, including one that estimated that major world economies—members of the G-20 cooperation forum—surpassed $1 trillion in subsidies for the first time in 2022. That’s a fourfold increase over subsidy levels in 2010, the year after G-20 nations agreed to phase out support for fossil fuels.
New Report Finds Carbon Capture And Storage Far Too Expensive
A new report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development found carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to be very expensive in Canada. According to the report, which focuses on carbon capture in the context of Canada's oil and gas industry, the climate solution’s persistently high costs are rooted in the "high design complexity and the need for customization."
CCS Can't Compete with Renewables, Won't Deliver by 2030, Report Finds
Carbon capture and storage may have an important role to play in hard-to-decarbonize sectors like iron and steel, but won't pay off for oil and gas companies without continuing government subsidies, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) concludes in an analysis released this week.
Carbon capture projects are too costly, have ‘questionable’ benefits, report finds
Technology the oil industry is counting on to reduce emissions–carbon capture and storage–is too expensive and difficult to deploy quickly enough to help Canada meet its climate commitments, a global environmental think tank says. Relying on carbon capture and storage to cut greenhouse gases from oil and gas production will mean large public subsidies for projects that are unable to compete on costs against expanding renewable energy sources, rendering the benefits "questionable," the International Institute for Sustainable Development said in a report released Thursday.