Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in Aviation and Shipping
Background note
Efforts to phase out fossil fuel subsidies in international aviation and maritime shipping are hindered by international agreements, global competition, and industry pressure. These subsidies lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions, unequal tax burden sharing, and an uneven playing field for competing modes of transport. Options exist to reduce subsidies through taxation, to change legislation to allow for broader subsidy reform, and to increase emission levies.
Recommendations
-
Countries should start or expand taxing aviation fuel in domestic flights.
-
Countries should unwind legal barriers to taxation of fossil fuels in international aviation, such as exemptions included in air service agreements and, in the case of Europe, the Energy Taxation Directive.
-
Countries should engage at the International Civil Aviation Organization to promote the adoption of an international emissions levy that is more stringent than the current Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA).
-
Countries should implement fossil fuel taxation in domestic shipping routes and, at the International Maritime Organization, support the adoption of an international shipping emissions levy of more than USD 100 per tonne of carbon dioxide.
Fossil fuels are rarely taxed in the aviation sector. For domestic flights, there is generally no legal barrier to fuel taxation, and countries could implement these taxes to create a level playing field between aviation and other transport modes. Fuel for international flights is often not taxed due to international air service agreements and, in the case of the European Union, the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD). Implementing an aviation fuel tax when air service agreements do not explicitly prohibit it, reforming these agreements—or in Europe, reforming the ETD—are options for countries to address these fossil fuel subsidies. Engaging with other countries at the International Civil Aviation Organization may present opportunities to introduce a global aviation emissions levy.
For shipping, domestic and regional legislation would need to be reformed to introduce a tax on shipping fuel. Internationally, ports face competition-related pressure to avoid taxing maritime fuel, as ships can travel long distances on one load of fuel and choose ports that offer cheaper refuelling. Although there are no plans to introduce a shipping fuel tax internationally, an emissions levy with similar effects to a fuel tax is likely to be established by the International Maritime Organization later this year. Negotiations are ongoing, and countries should support introducing a levy of more than USD 100 per tonne of carbon dioxide, with revenues potentially used for improving ship efficiency and lower-emission fuels, as well as providing climate finance for countries in the Global South.
You might also be interested in
Bonn Climate Talks 2026: What to expect after Santa Marta
With UN climate talks starting in Bonn soon, the shift to implementation is being felt, especially in the transition away from fossil fuels.
India’s State Energy Firms can Boost Energy Security by Progressively Shifting Over INR 2 Trillion Per Year From Fossil Fuels to Clean Energy
New research finds India’s nine state-owned energy companies could progressively redirect a significant share of their over INR 2 trillion annual capital expenditure toward clean and reliable energy, strengthening energy security while accelerating the low-carbon transition.
Scaling Up India’s Clean Energy can Protect its Economy—and its People—From Global Fuel Shocks
New analysis shows that rising levels of broad-based fossil fuel subsidies are limiting the fiscal space for governments to scale clean energy—precisely the solution India needs to decouple its energy system from volatile fossil fuel imports.
India's EV and battery manufacturing future depends on states playing to their strengths
India can become a global electric vehicle (EV) and battery manufacturing hub—but it depends on getting state policy design right.