The (Public) Cost of Pollution: Ontario's fossil fuel subsidies
This report provides an inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in Ontario and provides recommendations for provincial subsidy reform.
-
Each year, #Ontario provides nearly CAD 700 million in public subsidies for fossil fuels at the expense of investing in other policy areas that matter to Ontarians.
-
In 2018/19, #Ontario's largest fossil fuel subsidies included CAD 320 million in tax exemptions for fuels used by the aviation and rail industry.
Key Messages
- Each year, Ontario provides nearly CAD 700 million in public subsidies for fossil fuel consumption at the expense of investing in other policy areas that matter to Ontarians.
- The highest subsidies in Ontario fall into three categories: tax exemptions for aviation and railway fuels, tax exemptions for coloured fuel (e.g., fuel used in agriculture) and direct spending on natural gas expansion.
- Ontario has an opportunity to lead the charge on provincial fossil fuel subsidy reform. As a first step, Ontario should undertake a transparent self-review of the subsidies listed in this report to determine their efficiency and effectiveness.
IISD has documented the billions of public dollars that support fossil fuel production and consumption by the Canadian government. But fossil fuel spending is also a problem among Canadian provinces and territories.
Ontario spends nearly CAD 700 million each year in public subsidies for fossil fuel consumption. These subsidies represent large amounts of foregone public revenue that could be invested in everything from good jobs to education and healthcare. Spending money on fossil fuel encourages their use and contributes to the pollution that causes climate change. Ontario's largest subsidies include CAD 320 million in 2018/19 in tax exemptions for fuels used by the aviation and rail industry, CAD 225 million in 2018/19 in tax exemptions for coloured fuel (commonly used in agriculture) and at least CAD 100 million in direct spending on natural gas expansion in Budget 2018.
How can Ontario move away from fossil fuel spending to facilitate good fiscal management and a transition to a clean economy? The report recommends the following action areas for the province:
- Undertake a transparent self-review of all fossil fuel subsidies and identify potential areas for improved policy efficiency from economic, environmental and social perspectives.
- Develop an action plan to phase out subsidies to ensure responsible budgetary management, increased support for sustainable energy and support for affordable energy access for Ontarians.
- Establish clear guidelines to make sure that no new fossil fuel consumption or production subsidies are introduced without a thorough analysis, to ensure that they are absolutely essential, time limited, consistent with a long-term low-carbon economy, and that they are the only way to ensure policy objectives such as lowest-cost energy access.
- Proactively engage with the Government of Canada as they complete their G20 peer review of fossil fuel subsidies.
Participating experts
Additional downloads
Funded by
You might also be interested in
Leaders’ Club Cuts Fossil Fuel Finance but Falls Short on Clean Energy Support
Signatories of the Clean Energy Transition Partnership have cut their international public finance for fossil fuels dramatically since signing the agreement but are underdelivering on the clean finance pledge.
Revitalizing International Fossil Fuel Subsidy Phase-Out Commitments Through Roadmaps, Closing Loopholes, and Support
A new approach outlines how countries can strengthen fossil fuel subsidy reform commitments with time-bound roadmaps, closing loopholes, and support for lower-income countries.
How Fossil Fuels Drive Inflation and Make Life Less Affordable for Canadians
New report takes closer look at how Canada’s dependence on fossil fuels impacts energy costs and prices of essentials such as transportation, home heating, and housing.
Why Liquefied Natural Gas Expansion in Canada Is Not Worth the Risk
An analysis of the economic and environmental risks of liquified natural gas expansion in Canada.