Investment Treaty News Quarterly, Volume 1, Issue 4, July 2011
In this issue:
Philip Morris v. Uruguay: Will investor-state arbitration send restrictions on tobacco marketing up in smoke?; Australia's rejection of investor-state dispute settlement: Four potential contributing factors; Investment arbitration and the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement: Time for a change?; Foreign investment contracts and sustainable development: The new foundations begin to emerge; Federalism and international investment disputes; European Parliament calls for reform of European investment policy, but EU member states insist on the status quo; News in Brief, Awards and Decisions, Publications and Events.
Additional downloads
You might also be interested in
Decoding the Belt and Road Initiative’s Legal Architecture
This article unpacks the Belt and Road Initiative's legal architecture—covering hard law (such as treaties and contracts), soft law (such as memoranda of understanding), and the unique role of China's state-owned enterprises—and sets out recommendations for host country policy-makers on how to navigate this hybrid legal environment.
What Happened in Santa Marta?
What happened at the first international conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels? IISD experts share 7 takeaways and discuss what comes next.
Tax Incentives in National Investment Laws
This report maps the design, legal structure, and governance arrangements of tax incentives across 105 national investment laws to support better coordination among the institutions that shape these policies and help countries attract quality investment.
Understanding Investor–State Dispute Settlement in the Mining Sector
This brief introduces investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) for mining policy-makers and shows how understanding it helps governments design clearer rules, manage permits and contracts, prevent costly disputes, and protect policy spaces while maintaining a predictable investment climate.