Leveraging Trade to Support Climate Adaptation in Developing Countries
This paper aims to support trade negotiators in leveraging trade for climate change adaptation and to explore the critical role National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes can play in this regard.
It is well understood that climatic impacts on trade can be addressed by a host of climate adaptation measures, ranging from the development of resilient trade infrastructure to designing new financial products that promote investments in climate-resilient products and services. However, the inverse relationship of leveraging trade as a vehicle to support adaptation efforts has not been given much attention until now.
To help assess the role of trade in supporting adaptation measures, three general pathways are identified:
- Domestic trade policy measures that enhance access to adaptation goods and services: i.e., designing and applying tariffs, subsidies, government procurement rules, intellectual property rights, private voluntary sustainability standards, labels, and certification schemes, minimum requirements, and trade and investment facilitation measures to enable the importation of products and services needed to implement adaptation priorities but also incentivize the development of climate-resilient goods and services for export.
- Access to trade-related financing mechanisms that support climate adaptation, i.e., Using Aid for Trade and the Enhanced Integrated Framework.
- International collaborative frameworks on trade in support of climate adaptation: i.e., providing useful platforms for governments to support the advancement of adaptation priorities in a coordinated manner.
NAP processes offer many resources from which to draw to get a strong understanding of how climate change impacts affect the country and the priority actions and investments the government has identified to minimize loss and harm resulting from these impacts. And these can —and should —be used in mapping out how trade can be more strategically used to help a country meet its adaptation goals. Specifically, NAP documents point to the goods and services that will be required for adaptation, associated financing needs, and the cooperation opportunities that might be pursued with other countries. This paper draws from a review of the literature and consultations with key trade experts.
To illustrate the different links and opportunities offered by NAP processes, a review of NAP documents in three countries of the Pacific region (Fiji, Kiribati, and Tonga) was conducted. The Pacific was selected as a case study because it is an acutely vulnerable region in which the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) has worked via the NAP Global Network since 2017.
Funded by
You might also be interested in
Counting carbon in the food export business
Climate change is influencing the way consumers demand food. "Food miles" was an early expression of consumer power with farmers and campaigners in Europe and the US in the 2000s, promoting the idea that the distance a product travels from farm to the consumer contributes significantly to the overall carbon footprint of a food product.
Canada’s biggest emitters are paying the lowest carbon tax rate
On its oil sands in northern Alberta, Suncor Energy scrapes vast open-pit mines and drills down deep into the ground to extract the viscous bitumen that has turned it into one of the largest energy companies in North America. The process is so energy-intensive that it has also made the firm into Canada’s largest carbon emitter: it belches roughly 28 million tonnes into the atmosphere every year, equivalent to the entire emissions of Tunisia.
A Great Year for National Adaptation Planning and the Network to Watch in 2022
A new sense of urgency for climate action is being felt all around the world, and governments are now accelerating national efforts to put adaptation at the heart of decision making.
Development economist: U.S., EU might not see eye-to-eye on steel deal
While some in the U.S. view a recent deal with the European Union to resolve tariffs on steel and aluminum as a step toward a so-called “climate club” approach to global decarbonization, the EU likely will not, according to an economist who has been studying policies designed to guard against “carbon leakage.”