IISD Response to the United Kingdom Consultation on the Rosebank Field Development
The British government has invited input into a consultation on Equinor's application for consent for the Rosebank oil and gas field development. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation.
Key Messages
-
Equinor's further information is not consistent with the British government's guidance on assessing the effects of downstream Scope 3 emissions.
-
Developing Rosebank would not be consistent with Paris-aligned pathways.
-
The likely climate effects of Rosebank would be significant.
-
IISD recommends that the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero refuse to agree to the Oil and Gas Authority's grant of consent.
This brief is IISD's response to the British government's consultation on Equinor's application for consent for the Rosebank oil and gas field development.
The further information submitted by Equinor is not consistent with supplementary guidance issued by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) on assessing the effects of downstream Scope 3 emissions on climate, published in June 2025.
Had the assessment been conducted in a manner consistent with the DESNZ guidance and with the available scientific evidence, it would inevitably have concluded that Rosebank would likely have highly significant environmental effects, as it would not be consistent with pathways aligned with Paris Agreement goals.
Therefore, IISD recommends that the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero refuse to agree to the Oil and Gas Authority's grant of consent following the Secretary of State's conclusion regarding the environmental effects of the project, so the project may not proceed.
Instead, investing in clean energy jobs and industries is the way forward, to ensure just transition and economic diversification for workers and communities.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
July 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
Last month, global awarded oil and gas exploration acreage stood at around 354,000 square kilometres, a territory that’s roughly the size of Germany.