IISD Submission to the United Kingdom Consultation on Building the North Sea's Energy Future
The British government has invited input on its vision for the North Sea's clean energy future, including its commitment to end licensing for new oil and gas fields. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the consultation.
Policy Recommendations
-
The United Kingdom should join the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance as a core member.
-
The government should remove loopholes for licence extensions, licence transfers, and subsea tiebacks.
-
The government should consider more fully aligning with the science by ending the granting of development consents for new fields, including where licences already exist.
-
The North Sea Transition Authority should be given a revised objective of facilitating a managed and orderly decline in British oil and gas production consistent with 1.5°C.
This brief is IISD's response to the British government's consultation on its vision for the North Sea's clean energy future. In addition to ending the licensing of new oil and gas exploration, IISD recommends the following:
- To maximize the leadership effect, the United Kingdom should join the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance as a core member.
- The government should give greater confidence and clarity by removing loopholes for licence extensions, licence transfers, and subsea tiebacks; such loopholes undermine the policy and the British leadership potential.
- The government should consider more fully aligning with the science by ending the granting of development consents for new fields, including where licences already exist. The International Energy Agency has established that this additional step is needed to be consistent with its 1.5°C scenario, and IISD research has found that the same conclusion follows from other 1.5°C scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others.
- The objective of "maximising economic recovery" of oil and gas should be repealed, as it is inherently inconsistent with stabilizing the climate. The North Sea Transition Authority should instead be given a revised objective of facilitating a managed and orderly decline in British oil and gas production consistent with 1.5°C.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
July 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
Last month, global awarded oil and gas exploration acreage stood at around 354,000 square kilometres, a territory that’s roughly the size of Germany.