Making the Leap
The need for Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) to support leapfrogging fossil gas to a clean renewable energy future
This brief argues that Just Energy Transition Partnerships (in South Africa, Indonesia, India, Vietnam and Senegal) should support leapfrogging from fossil to renewable energy.
-
South Africa, Indonesia, India, and Vietnam source a large proportion of their coal domestically, but an energy transition using gas would expose their economies to the types of volatility and high prices currently being experienced by European countries, which has led to a cost-of-living crisis
-
36.9 million people in the JETP countries lack access to energy. Many people who lack access to modern energy live in rural areas, and the modularity and lability to be installed without needing expensive grid extensions makes wind and solar energy ideally suited to meeting this energy access need.
-
Stranding of assets and the misuse of valuable economic capital through misplaced investments in fossil fuel infrastructure, including for fossil gas, can be avoided through investing in renewable energy infrastructure that is better future-proofed.
Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) are a new funding model created to help South Africa, Indonesia, India, Vietnam, and Senegal transition away from fossil energy and toward clean energy in a way that also addresses social issues associated with such an energy transition. They are also expected to leverage parallel investments in the energy systems of the JETP countries. While there is pressure from some of the JETP countries to make a bridging transition to gas, this is technically unnecessary, economically disadvantageous, and dangerous for the climate. Each of the JETP countries has significant solar and wind resources they should be supported to develop. JETPs need to support a direct transition to clean energy that provides signals to the wider investment community that participating governments are committed to a global clean energy transition.
You might also be interested in
What Will Happen at COP 29?
Talks at the 2024 UN Climate Change Conference (COP 29) will range from defining a way forward on finance through a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) to mitigation, and loss and damage. Ahead of negotiations in Baku, IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin Team Lead Jennifer Bansard examines the agenda and breaks down what to watch as eyes turn to Azerbaijan.
Ending Export Credits for Oil and Gas: How OECD countries can end 2024 with a climate win
For a year now, Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OECD) governments have been negotiating an agreement that could put an end to oil and gas export finance. Following the acrimony in Baku, this would be a very real way for the OECD to show policy coherence, respond to calls from the poorest countries to stop subsidizing fossil fuels, and shift public finance to solutions.
Fossil Fuel Production, Renewable Energy, and Subsidy Reform in Nationally Determined Contributions 3.0
This policy brief provides an analysis of the critical benchmarks and recommendations necessary for aligning nationally determined contributions (NDCs) with the 1.5 °C target.
An OECD Deal on Ending Oil and Gas Export Credits Is Urgently Needed. Here’s What it Could Look Like.
The European Union, the United Kingdom, and Canada have introduced a proposal to end oil and gas financing by export credit agencies at the OECD. Pressure is building to reach a deal by the end of 2024.