RE-ARCTIC: Promoting renewable energy, eliminating fossil fuel subsidies and benefitting communities in the North
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) presented its vision of renewable energy development to the Sustainable Development Working Group of the Arctic Council in Whitehorse on March 1, 2015.
Renewable sources seem to be a straightforward way to provide “sustainable energy for all” in the Arctic. The Arctic has vast reserves of renewable energy, including hydro-, bio-, wind and geothermal power. Renewable energy technologies have been successfully tested and put in operation in the Arctic. Large-scale hydropower accounts for up to 75 per cent of electricity in Greenland and a significant share of electricity supply in northern Norway, Russia, Iceland and some other parts of the Arctic.
Small-scale renewable energy technologies and off-grid solutions for remote communities have also been successfully applied in the Arctic. There are striking similarities and synergies in terms of renewable energy solutions for small remote communities in the Arctic and in small island and archipelago states, in some of which (for instance, the Philippines or Cape Verde) renewable energy accounts for 25 to 30 per cent of electricity generation, with successful off-grid installations.
Yet, despite this evidence in favour of renewable energy development in the Arctic, the uptake of renewable energy in the region has been slow. The work that IISD has undertaken on successful policies for deployment of renewables around the world suggests several lessons learned that may be highly relevant for the Arctic:
Clear long-term targets and policies supporting renewables are essential to ensure investors’ decisions.
Phase-out of subsidies to fossil fuels (such as highly subsidized diesel in the Arctic), is essential to promote renewable energy. Subsidies to fossil fuels distort the playing field for renewable energy that can be cost-competitive in remote communities if there are no such distortions.
Public–private partnerships are essential; dedicated funds to support renewable energy development can be accumulated in a number of ways, including through environmental taxes (carbon tax, taxes on pollution, etc.).
Market integration on both the supply and demand sides is important to bring down the costs of renewable energy, which requires cooperation and synergies across different jurisdictions in the Arctic.
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
IISD Submission to the Belém Mission to 1.5
This submission is made in response to the invitation from the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) 29, COP 30, and COP 31 Presidencies on the Belém Mission to 1.5.