Toward a National Adaptation Strategy for Canada: Key insights from global peers
Severe weather events in 2020-one of the warmest years on record-caused CAD 2.4 billion in insured damage in Canada, the fourth highest annual damage on record (Insurance Bureau of Canada, 2021).
Countries around the world have taken steps to embed adaptation in policies and decision-making, with 72% of countries having adopted at least one national-level adaptation planning instrument-such as a plan, strategy, policy, or law-while another 9% are in the process of developing one.
Defining institutional arrangements is essential to adaptation action. Clearly establishing roles and responsibilities ensures coordinated action horizontally at the national level as well vertically with sub-national actors.
This report, Toward a National Adaptation Strategy for Canada: Key insights from global peers, outlines some key issues and considerations that can help the federal government kick-start the development of Canada’s NAS.
The aim is to provide context and direction for the process so that the federal government can quickly get started. It reviews the global trends in adaptation planning, summarizes federal adaptation efforts to date, and builds on both to lay out some of key considerations for Canada’s NAS. International experience and good practices identified were drawn from an examination of 12 adaptation policy instruments from 11 countries, in combination with key informant interviews. The policy instruments were assessed in terms of the emphasis on scientific assessments of climate vulnerability and risks, the use of detailed frameworks for prioritizing risks and adaptation solutions, the number of defined adaptation actions, the inclusion of adaptation targets and indicators, references to progress reporting, and the degree to which they addressed social inclusion. The country review revealed that:
- Legislative backing for adaptation action at the national level is on the rise, with more countries adopting laws in recent years.
- Iterative adaptation planning is taking place, with more than half of the policy instruments examined having recently been updated or are about to be updated.
- Most countries reviewed have codified who is responsible for coordinating adaptation action at the national level and between jurisdictions.
- Many countries have defined cycles of climate risk assessment, planning, implementation, and review, and most countries articulate a clear process and timeframe for progress reporting.
- Almost all policy instruments reference social inclusion issues, but very few emphasize matters such as gender equality regularly and throughout.
Reflecting on the current state of adaptation policies, institutions, and knowledge resources in Canada, along with findings of the international review, the report offers 13 mutually reinforcing considerations divided into four main aspects for Canada as it develops its strategy. These are:
1. Set the stage for a successful NAS development process
- Define the exact role and purpose of the NAS
- Specify clear institutional arrangements for the NAS
- Build an inclusive and progressive engagement process
2. Include core elements for mobilizing federal action on adaptation
- Develop a unified approach to climate risk assessment at the national level
- Enable policy alignment around climate-resilient development
- Leverage the NAS to advance reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada
- Design a clear framework and system for tracking progress in adaptation
3. Facilitate early and sustained action
- Bridge the implementation gap
- Create a knowledge management strategy
4. Position Canada as a leader on adaptation
- Put gender equality and social inclusion at the heart of Canada’s approach to adaptation
- Recognize the employment and labour aspects of adaptation
- Elevate the role of nature in managing climate risks
- Address adaptation issues outside of Canada’s borders
With these considerations in mind, the federal government can work with other governments and key stakeholders throughout Canada to develop a unified vision and approach to preparing and protecting Canadians against the accelerating impacts of climate change.
You might also be interested in
The Value of Water Retention Beneficial Management Practices to Farmers and Landowners in the Seine Rat Roseau Watershed District
This report assesses the economic returns to communities and landowners from implementing on-farm water retention projects in the Seine, Rat, and Roseau watersheds in Manitoba, Canada.
Biodiversité: les subventions pour la destruction de la nature
Des centaines de millions de dollars de plus sont nécessaires chaque année pour renverser les pertes de biodiversité —restaurer les forêts et les terres humides, établir des zones protégées, mettre en place une agriculture plus durable. Mais ce n’est pas seulement une question d’investissements dans la protection de la biodiversité. Les gouvernements doivent aussi cesser de subventionner sa destruction.
Seal River Watershed: The case for conservation
This report lays out the benefits and considerations for establishing the Seal River Watershed Indigenous Protected Area in Manitoba, Canada.
From Sharm el-Sheikh to Montreal: Seizing the moment for the biodiversity–climate nexus at COP 15
The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework negotiations at the UN Biodiversity Conference in Montreal represent a once-in-a-decade moment to set an ambitious agenda for biodiversity conservation.