How Indonesia Can Achieve Both a COVID-19 Recovery and Its Climate Targets
Achieving a Fossil-Free Recovery in Indonesia | Brief 1
-
Indonesia spent 19% (USD 7.5 billion) of its 2020 COVID-19 recovery package on support for the energy sector, with the majority going to the fossil fuel sector. This came in addition to the already very high fossil fuel subsidies (USD 6.8 billion in 2020).
-
An important part of Indonesia’s COVID-19 recovery package (USD 6.6 billion, 16.3% of total recovery support) went to support fossil fuel state-owned enterprises (SOEs). It also dedicated USD 910 million to subsidize electricity for poor households.
-
The current renewable energy share (11.2%) in the Indonesian energy mix is far from the 23% target by 2025. Given this target and Indonesia’s new Net-Zero Emission (NZE) initiative, there is a need to significantly increase renewable energy investment. COVID-19 recovery support can help address this need.
The Government of Indonesia (GoI) has supported the recovery of its economy since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic through its National Economic Recovery package, which covered several sectors. As part of the support to the energy sector, the country’s recovery package 2020 allocated much more direct support to fossil fuels than to renewable energy—despite Indonesia’s falling well behind its target of 23% renewable energy by 2025.
To meet its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) target as well as the current plan on net-zero emissions, there is a need to significantly increase renewable energy investment. It is a missed opportunity if the COVID-19 recovery funds are not spent to promote renewables. This investment would result in a win-win scenario in Indonesia as new investments and jobs would be created in renewable energy, which would align with the country’s climate ambitions.
To achieve the objective of achieving the NDC targets and net-zero, any fiscal stimulus to the fossil fuel sector (even if deemed necessary) should be conditional to transitioning away from fossil fuels. Furthermore, taxing the fossil fuel sector could aid the COVID-19 recovery and energy transition. Lastly, higher transparency in COVID-19 spending is important to increase public trust in the government.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Will Officials Resurrect Old Superfund Taxes To Support The Infrastructure Bill?
Every year, G20 governments spend $584 billion supporting the fossil fuels industry through "budgetary transfers and tax expenditure, price support, public finance, and SOE investment for the production and consumption of fossil fuels at home and abroad," according to a report published last year by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
All Hands on Deck: Mobilizing our climate community for COP 26 and beyond
The Glasgow talks can send an important signal of whether the Paris Agreement can serve as an effective catalyst for countries to keep a 1.5° Celsius pathway within reach.
The post-covid fossil fuels boom
Don't look now but the world is in a fossil fuels boom. As the economy bounces back from covid-19, the global demand for oil, gas and coal is skyrocketing. Yet didn't international leaders just make new climate pledges that promise to cut out these fossil fuels? How do we make sense of this contradiction? How long will the fossil fuel boom last? And will it send our climate goals out of reach?
Glasgow didn’t deliver on 1.5 C, but not all is lost
The agreement to come out of COP26 is leaving many disappointed for not securing a climate-safe future, but some progress was made that advocates say shouldn’t be ignored.