Recovery Through Reform: Advancing a hydrogen economy while minimizing fossil fuel subsidies
There is a risk that new blue hydrogen projects may, by 2030, be at a competitive disadvantage, at least from that point forward.
Funding for carbon capture projects already represents a significant source of fossil fuel subsidies in Canadian jurisdictions.
Given Canada's commitment to phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and reach net-zero by 2050, and the need to rapidly transition to clean energy, a very high bar must be set to justify subsidies for blue hydrogen.
Spending on hydrogen has the potential to significantly influence the direction taken by the world’s energy systems. In December 2020, Canada unveiled a national hydrogen strategy following the announcement of a strengthened climate plan. The strategy emphasized both blue and green hydrogen. As the government considers whether to provide subsidies for hydrogen, we recommend government:
- Ensure that any subsidies for hydrogen are in line with the government’s commitments to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 and meet net-zero by 2050.
- Thoroughly evaluate the potential efficiency of subsidies for hydrogen against robust social, environmental, and economic criteria. • Improve transparency by publicly reporting on direct spending and tax expenditures for hydrogen production.
- Follow international best practices being set by Canada’s peers. For example, Germany and Spain have laid out hydrogen strategies prioritizing green hydrogen.
Based on IISD's analysis, subsidies for hydrogen based on natural gas without significant levels of carbon capture and storage (CCS) should not be eligible for government assistance. Subsidies for blue hydrogen should only occur if blue hydrogen can meet the same level of environmental performance (including emission intensity) and is at or below the cost of green hydrogen.
This brief is one of three International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) policy briefs in its Recovery Through Reform series, which assesses how efforts to achieve a green recovery from COVID-19 in Canada rely on—and can contribute to—fossil fuel subsidy reform.
You might also be interested in
Funding for Fossil Fuels Could Derail Canada's New Plan to Reduce Emissions
The Canadian federal government aims to use their recent climate plan and budget as the basis to tackle climate change over coming years. However, subsidies to the fossil fuel industry and new production projects threaten to undermine progress.
Trevor Hancock: B.C. government's LNG infatuation makes it dangerously radical
The Sierra Club B.C. announced in February that it is taking the provincial government to court “for failing to present plans to achieve several key climate targets, as required by its own climate change legislation.”
One BC Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reached $1.2 Billion Last Year
Last year the provincial government gave away $1.2 billion in a single fossil fuel subsidy known as the Deep Well Royalty Credit, a tax credit for hydraulic fracturing wells, according to new analysis by Stand.earth.
Time for Manitoba to take greater action to fight climate change, expert says
Manitoba is well-positioned to combat climate change — so it's time to stop "sitting on our laurels" and take greater action, according to an international think tank leader.