
What Can Least Developed Countries and Other Climate Vulnerable Countries Expect from The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)?
The upcoming European Commission proposal for the CBAM is scheduled for formal release on July 14, 2021, with the international trade and climate policy community alike watching closely to see what the mechanism could entail.
The coming months are then expected to see intense haggling among the EU institutions for a final version of the CBAM, which will be part of the bloc's wider "Fit for 55" package of climate and energy legislation designed to meet its emissions reduction target of 55 percent relative to 1990 levels by 2030.
As this process unfolds, how the CBAM will affect those countries most vulnerable to climate change - including least developed countries and small island developing states - is a crucial question and one that merits greater attention.
This briefing explains:
- the differences between the draft language of the European Commission proposal and the European Parliament's position, and what these options mean for climate vulnerable countries;
- which climate vulnerable countries will be most affected, considering which sectors are likely to be covered under the early stages of a CBAM, which countries rely strongly carbon-intensive sectors, and which countries count the EU as a major export market;
- what the CBAM could mean for international climate action efforts under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC);
- how the revenues from the CBAM could support the transition to low-carbon economies abroad and why the final CBAM should adopt this approach; and
- how the design of this CBAM and complementary measures can account for the interests of least developed countries and other climate vulnerable economies and why it is crucial to have an integrated strategy on trade, development, and climate.
This joint briefing was prepared by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI, by its acronym in French), the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), IISD, and the Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Canada’s biggest emitters are paying the lowest carbon tax rate
On its oil sands in northern Alberta, Suncor Energy scrapes vast open-pit mines and drills down deep into the ground to extract the viscous bitumen that has turned it into one of the largest energy companies in North America. The process is so energy-intensive that it has also made the firm into Canada’s largest carbon emitter: it belches roughly 28 million tonnes into the atmosphere every year, equivalent to the entire emissions of Tunisia.
Development economist: U.S., EU might not see eye-to-eye on steel deal
While some in the U.S. view a recent deal with the European Union to resolve tariffs on steel and aluminum as a step toward a so-called “climate club” approach to global decarbonization, the EU likely will not, according to an economist who has been studying policies designed to guard against “carbon leakage.”
Carbon border adjustments are back in the spotlight
Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s recently released mandate letter will keep her busy for the foreseeable future.
Net-Zero Should Not Be a Net Loss for Low-Income Economies
As countries make the transition towards net-zero economies, what do these policies mean for international trade?