Gas Prospects in Colombia
A preliminary assessment of the economic risks and energy needs associated with new gas investments in the country
This brief focuses on those licensed offshore gas reserves in Colombia that are being explored but have not yet received a final investment decision. We assess some the risks of such exploration in the context of Colombia's recent political developments and climate ambitions and discuss what alternatives are available to mitigate such risks. We conclude that there is no economic or other case for Colombia to develop the untapped fields under existing licences.
The science is clear: according to all major Paris-aligned energy scenarios, for the world to reach net-zero emissions in line with the 1.5°C limit, global oil and gas production needs to decline rapidly. This pace of decline is as fast as or faster than projected declines in production from existing fields. Therefore, to minimize stranded assets and carbon lock-in, no new oil and gas fields can be opened.
The Colombian government, led by President Gustavo Petro, announced at the end of 2022 (and reiterated in January this year at the World Economic Forum in Davos) its commitment to not grant any new licences for oil and gas exploration. This political will is also behind Colombia’s decision in August 2023 to join the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance (BOGA) as a Friend of BOGA, a coalition of international actors working to advance clean energy transitions and reduce countries' dependency on fossil fuels. The commitment not to grant any new oil and gas licences was part of the government's electoral program ahead of winning the elections.
This commitment represents a historic decision for Colombia, the region, and the world. However, the "no-new-licences" provision leaves out a number of exploration projects that were licensed prior to the government's decision but have not yet been developed.
This brief focuses on those licensed offshore gas reserves that are being explored but have not yet received a final investment decision. The key objective of this analysis is to assess the risks of such exploration in the context of Colombia's recent political developments and climate ambitions and to discuss what alternatives are available to mitigate such risks. We conclude that there is no economic or other case for Colombia to develop the untapped fields under existing licences.
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
July 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
Last month, global awarded oil and gas exploration acreage stood at around 354,000 square kilometres, a territory that’s roughly the size of Germany.