Blocking Ambition: Fossil fuel subsidies in Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador
Canada's four fossil fuel-producing provinces provided CAD 2.5 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in the 2020/21 fiscal year.
Provinces have doubled down on fossil fuels as a pandemic recovery strategy, adding new subsidies despite the economic and climate risks.
Without action by provinces, Canada cannot achieve its climate targets and limit warming to 1.5°C.
Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies in Canada requires provinces to step up. While the federal government has committed to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2023, movement on the subsidy file cannot rely on federal commitments alone. This report examines levels of fossil fuel subsidies in Canada’s main fossil fuel-producing provinces: British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador.
In total, these four provinces provided at least CAD 2.5 billion in fossil fuel subsidies in fiscal year (FY) 2020/21 and 1.5 billion in FY 2021/22 (as of December 2021).
Provinces are diverting significant public funds to incentivize fossil fuel production that may not otherwise occur, and provincial governments are missing out on millions in uncollected royalty and tax revenue from fossil fuels.
- British Columbia provided CAD 765.3 million in subsidies in FY 2020/21. The province continues to support liquefied natural gas, undermining the CleanBC plan as well as any other climate progress the provincial government is making.
- Alberta’s subsidies totalled CAD 1.32 billion in FY 2020/21. Alberta committed to fossil fuel production as a pandemic recovery strategy, increasing subsidies and dispensing the Technology, Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) Fund in ways that incentivize fossil fuel production.
- Saskatchewan provided subsidies of CAD 409.3 million in FY 2020/21 and has introduced new subsidies in recent years, such as drilling incentives for producers.
- Newfoundland and Labrador’s subsidies totalled CAD 82.6 million in FY 2020/21. Subsidies are increasing, and recent changes to the royalty structure for the Terra Nova oil field will cost taxpayers an additional CAD 300 million over the lifespan of the project.
You might also be interested in
Doubling Down on Alberta's Oil and Gas Sector Is a Risk Canadians Can’t Afford to Take
There's no question that people across Alberta need urgent help. But is injecting tens of billions into oil and gas corporations the right kind of help?
New Report Finds Carbon Capture And Storage Far Too Expensive
A new report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development found carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to be very expensive in Canada. According to the report, which focuses on carbon capture in the context of Canada's oil and gas industry, the climate solution’s persistently high costs are rooted in the "high design complexity and the need for customization."
CCS Can't Compete with Renewables, Won't Deliver by 2030, Report Finds
Carbon capture and storage may have an important role to play in hard-to-decarbonize sectors like iron and steel, but won't pay off for oil and gas companies without continuing government subsidies, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) concludes in an analysis released this week.
Carbon capture projects are too costly, have ‘questionable’ benefits, report finds
Technology the oil industry is counting on to reduce emissions–carbon capture and storage–is too expensive and difficult to deploy quickly enough to help Canada meet its climate commitments, a global environmental think tank says. Relying on carbon capture and storage to cut greenhouse gases from oil and gas production will mean large public subsidies for projects that are unable to compete on costs against expanding renewable energy sources, rendering the benefits "questionable," the International Institute for Sustainable Development said in a report released Thursday.