Monitoring and Evaluation of Climate Adaptation at the National Level
In previous years, much of the discussion around the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of climate adaptation focused on the development of frameworks and indicator systems at the project and program levels. Relatively little attention has been paid to M&E at higher or more aggregated levels—i.e. portfolio, national, regional and international—where the institutional contexts, processes and content for such systems are more complex.
For this project, IISD collaborated with GIZ to conduct a comparative analysis of 10 M&E systems at aggregate levels based on document analysis and stakeholder interviews. The results provide an analysis of the 10 systems reviewed in terms of:
- Context: The policy framework of adaptation, the purpose of the M&E system, and its level of application and aggregation.
- Process: The institutions charged with overseeing M&E of adaptation, the process of how the M&E system has been established, and the steps involved in monitoring and evaluating adaptation.
- Content: The different approaches to M&E of adaptation, the data and information required for analysis, and the outputs and reporting products associated with each system.
The analysis also produced a repository of adaptation indicators used in the M&E systems reviewed. The repository serves as a reference point for practitioners who are involved in the development of M&E systems, providing illustrative examples to help inform selection and development of indicators that best serve their own country-specific and decision-making contexts. IISD is building on this work through further collaboration with GIZ to develop a guidebook for decision-makers in developing M&E systems at (sub)national levels.
Latest
You might also be interested in
Unpacking the Implications of the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Climate Change
The ICJ made history with its long-awaited opinion on climate change in 2025. We’re laying out what states need to know about their legal obligations.
Understanding Climate Risks Through an Intersectional Approach (iCRA)
This project investigates how intersecting systems of inequity based on gender inequality, ageism, ableism, and other forms of discrimination shape vulnerability to climate change. It will involve collaborative case study research, led by Prakriti Resources Centre in Nepal and Urban Earth in South Africa, to test how intersectional climate risk assessments (CRAs) can help to advance inclusive and effective adaptation in practice and policies.
Friends of Climate and Health
The Friends of Climate and Health is an informal group of countries working to foster international collaboration on climate change and health.
Prairie Watershed Analytics
Prairie Watershed Analytics is focused on providing Canadians in the Prairies with the information they need to understand their local watershed. Watershed models can support local decision-makers and businesses with evaluating ecosystem services and connecting with environmental incentive programs. Prairie Watershed Analytics is making this practice simple and accessible using open data and toolsto automate and scale watershed modeling tailored to the Prairies.