Ahead of G20 Summit, Leading Research Organizations Tracking Global Recovery Spending Call on Governments to Green COVID-19 Stimulus
October 29, 2021—One day before G20 leaders come together in Rome and just before COP 26, research organizations heading four recovery trackers have issued a joint statement urging further greening of COVID-19 response.
The statement builds on data collected by the Energy Policy Tracker, the Global Recovery Observatory, the Greenness of Stimulus Index, and the Green Recovery Tracker covering thousands of policies adopted worldwide since the beginning of the pandemic. The signatories agree that, despite recent efforts from governments, the share of green recovery spending—representing 10 to 20% of recovery spending globally—is still insufficient to drive the urgent shift needed to limit global temperature rise to 1.5°C.
The research organizations call on world leaders to use the upcoming international meetings to set clear spending targets to green their stimulus spending. Highlighting that fossil fuel-intensive activities still represent around 40% of public spending in the energy sector, they argue that governments should commit to a fossil-free recovery, where public finance no longer supports fossil fuel production and respects a “do no harm” principle. The signatories also point to a range of tools and policies that can accelerate a green recovery while creating decent jobs and driving innovations, such as skill retraining measures, research and development, and a better integration of nature and biodiversity in recovery plans.
The statement comes at a critical point in time, when enhanced action is imperative to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. As governments continue working to ‘build back better’ from the pandemic, the signatories say this means redirecting all future public recovery spending toward a resilient, nature-positive, and climate-safe economy. Strengthened international cooperation and support are also essential to enable an equitable and just green recovery worldwide, they note.
The signatories warn that maintaining the status quo could lock the world into a dangerous high-carbon pathway for decades.
Quotes
Jeffrey Beyer, Greenness of Stimulus Index Lead, Finance for Biodiversity, said:
“Public money must be spent for public good, but the GSI and other trackers all show that COVID-19 stimulus has done more harm than good for nature and the climate. Governments must systematically change how budgets are assessed and spent to ensure that all future public spending enhances nature and protects the climate.”
Helena Mölter, Research Associate, Wuppertal Institute, said:
“Though the 37% target set by the European Commission clearly pushed EU member states to green their recovery plans, they are still not aligned with the bloc’s new 2030 climate target and not used to accelerate the climate transition in line with the new target. Hence, it is crucial to link investments with reforms and national energy and climate policy.”
Satoshi Kojima, Director of Kansai Research Centre and Principal Researcher, Climate and Energy Area, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, said:
“The trackers show us where we are and what we must urgently do. We hope that the insights they provide will help policymakers take evidence-based measures to move toward resilient and decarbonised economies.”
Angela Picciarello, Senior Research Officer, ODI, said:
“What the various data on global recovery spending shows is that governments need to direct their public spending away from fossil fuels and toward clean energy in more systematic ways. Tools such as green taxonomies and budgeting approaches can help achieve this.”
Joachim Roth, Policy Analyst, International Institute for Sustainable Development, said:
“Governments have made some progress since last year in increasing their share of clean energy commitments but this is still insufficient to drive the much-needed and urgent shift from fossil fuels to clean energy. To truly align with a 1.5°C scenario, public finance can no longer support fossil fuel production.”
Izael Da Silva, Professor, Strathmore University, said:
“As nations devise a variety of post-COVID economic stimulus packages and recovery plans, two guiding principles must be taken into consideration: the first one is to encourage investments and incentives in green technology to curb carbon emissions and the second is to put people at the center of the initiatives geared towards sustainable development for the whole planet.”
For more information, please contact:
Lucile Dufour, +33 677 274 003, [email protected]
Anna Riesenweber, +49 202 2492-106, [email protected]
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 120 people, plus over 150 associates and consultants, come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Putting Poverty Alleviation and Inequality Reduction at the Heart of the Energy Transition
As governments implement the ambitious policies needed to transform the energy system, they must also account for the resulting impacts on inequality and poverty.
Governments' Climate Laws Could Spur $340B In ISDS Claims
As governments consider how and when to enact legislation or mitigation measures meant to address climate change, a study shows there is a pricey cause for concern as fossil fuel companies could bring legal claims worth billions of dollars against them in order to protect their assets.
The fossil fuel industry has a trillion-dollar secret weapon to kneecap climate action
On his first day in office, President Joe Biden revoked the permit for the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, which would have brought exceptionally dirty oil south from Canada across the Plains. The project’s owner, Calgary-based TC Energy, saw billions in future profits go up in smoke. So it turned to an arcane but potentially explosive tool to try to recoup the loss, filing a claim under the now-defunct North American Free Trade Agreement. The company is seeking $15 billion.
Investor-state disputes threaten the global green energy transition
To limit global warming to below 1.5°C, governments will have to simultaneously curb demand for fossil fuels and limit supply. However, efforts to limit supply will affect asset holders, particularly in the upstream (exploration and production) and midstream (transportation and storage) portions of the supply chain. Demands for compensation will ensue, and when the companies involved are foreign, legal claims may be brought to international arbitration in a process known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) (see the first figure). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has recently acknowledged that ISDS cases could lead to states refraining from, or delaying, measures to phase out fossil fuels.