Understanding the Role of Subsidies in South Africa's Coal-Based Liquid Fuel Sector
Sasol received ZAR 1.552 billion through the Basic Fuel Price, the price paid to producers of petroleum and synthetic fuels. On top of that, the company received an indirect subsidy of over ZAR 6.5 billion due to an exemption from the Carbon Tax Act 15 of 2019 that permits Sasol to emit 302 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent between 2016 and 2020.
Every time a motorist fills up their tank, about 5% of the bill is being paid as a subsidy to Sasol because of the way fuels are priced. This money could be better spent elsewhere or returned to consumers.
Sasol does not meet environmental standards under South Africa's Technical Guidelines for Monitoring, Reporting and Verifying of GHGs 2017; it is expected to under-report its emissions until at least 2025.
This study finds that, in 2019, the total value of market price support (MPS) and carbon tax exemptions to Sasol was ZAR 6.6 billion (USD 380 million). The majority of these savings are from the carbon tax exemption, but MPS is responsible for around 5% of the cost of each litre of CTL gasoline sold. These support measures contribute to the high-profile role of coal in South Africa’s transport sector. It is difficult to see compatibility between the continued consumption of coal-based fuels and South Africa’s commitments under the Paris Agreement. Pricing policies also subsidize domestic petroleum refining at a cost to consumers. Subsidy reforms in the sector should focus on aligning energy policy with social and environmental objectives and promoting a shift to cleaner energy sources while employing “just transition” policies to ensure that no one is left behind.
You might also be interested in
Why South Africa should stop spending billions to support fossil fuels
Pollution from fossil fuel use costs South Africans hundreds of billions of rands in public health damage and environmental harm each year, say Chido Muzondo and Richard Bridle.
Govt spends billions subsidising fossil fuels at huge social cost - report
South Africa is the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases on the continent, with Sasol and Eskom together responsible for more than half of these emissions. A report published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) says South Africa spent R172 billion on energy subsidies in the 2020 financial year, with the highest subsidies allocated to fossil fuels.
Govt's massive fossil fuel subsidies are hurting SA, report finds
South Africa's energy subsidies, mainly dominated by fossil fuels, more than tripled to R172 billion between 2017/18 and 2020/21. This has come at a huge societal cost, according to research by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
South Africa’s Energy Subsidies Tripled Since 2017, Hitting ZAR 172 Billion in 2020
Energy subsidies in South Africa more than tripled between FY2017 and FY2020 to ZAR 172 billion (USD 10.4 billion), with the highest subsidies allocated to fossil fuels, according to a new report.