Turning Pledges Into Action
How Glasgow Statement signatories can meet their commitment to shift international public finance out of fossil fuels and into clean energy by the end of 2022
Report by @IISD_news @PriceofOil @Tearfund finds countries need to get on track to meet @COP26 #StopFundingFossils commitment. With 6 months left, we need robust fossil-fuel exclusion policies and scaled up clean energy support.
Commitments to #StopFundingFossils CAN be implemented as a handful of countries have shown with robust fossil fuel exclusion policies. Dive into our report to see how countries can build an energy secure, sustainable & safe future by shifting finance to clean energy!
Glasgow Statement signatories could shift $28 billion/yr in intl' public finance out of fossils & into a just energy transition—but only a few have published updated policies that turn these pledges into reality. We need urgent action in the next 6 months!
At the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP 26) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 39 governments and public finance institutions joined the Statement on International Public Support for the Clean Energy Transition, a joint commitment to end international public finance for fossil fuels and instead prioritize public finance for clean energy.
The war in Ukraine and the compounding debt, climate, and energy price crises mean that now more than ever, public finance needs to be prioritized for the energy efficiency and clean energy solutions that can accelerate the transition toward a more secure, sustainable, and peaceful future away from fossil fuel dependence.
This report highlights key opportunities and challenges for signatories to the Glasgow Statement to meet their commitments to end international public finance for fossil fuels by the end of 2022 and instead prioritize public finance for clean energy. It identifies good practices for policies that exclude international public finance for fossil fuels, assesses the current status of implementation of the Glasgow Statement, and gauges the efforts required to implement the statement in line with the 1.5°C global warming limit. The report contains detailed case studies on Ethiopia and Sri Lanka, examining how the Glasgow Statement can play an important role in accelerating a clean and just energy transition in low- and middle-income countries.
This report explores the unprecedented potential and the challenges of implementing the statement. It finds that:
- The Glasgow Statement could directly shift USD 28 billion in international public finance for fossil fuels toward a clean and just energy transition each year.
- Most countries and institutions have yet to publicize Glasgow-aligned policies. Export credit agencies’ pre-existing policies lag behind most and need to be significantly improved.
- The main implementation risks that signatories must avoid are introducing large exemptions for gas support and the lack of concrete strategies to increase transformative clean energy support.
- Good practices exist: robust policies excluding international public finance for fossil fuels are in place in Denmark and the United Kingdom, as well as at Swedfund, the French Development Agency, Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden, and the European Investment Bank.
- Case studies on Ethiopia and Sri Lanka show that the Glasgow Statement can play an important role in avoiding fossil fuel lock-in and accelerating a clean and just energy transition in low- and middle-income countries.
The report recommends that high-income signatories that provide international energy finance should aim to develop and publish updated policies for ending international public finance for fossil fuels and advancing a clean and just energy transition by COP 27. These policies should match the existing best-in-class policies, aligning with the 1.5°C goal. In addition, signatories should use the statement as an opportunity to shift the wider international public finance landscape and work together to secure new signatories to join the statement by COP 27, notably by using their voices and votes as MDB shareholders against new financing for fossil fuel projects and ensuring that regional coalitions or associations align with the Glasgow Statement.
You might also be interested in
Implementing Solar Irrigation Sustainably
This guidebook provides recommendations to state policy-makers on how they can implement solar irrigation models, particularly decentralized solar plants for irrigation under the PM-KUSUM scheme, effectively and sustainably.
Agrivoltaics in India
This background paper assesses the current state of development of agrivoltaics in India and identifies the challenges and opportunities for its commercialization.
Lukas Schaugg: "The Energy Charter Treaty hinders climate action"
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), established decades ago to facilitate energy investments in Europe and Central Asia, is now being challenged and accused of protecting investments in fossil fuels. Faced with the failure of the reform processes undertaken so far, several European countries, notably France and Germany, have decided to exit the ECT. However, the treaty is trying to expand to Africa as new oil and gas fields are discovered on the continent. In this interview, Lukas Schaugg, International Law Analyst at the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), describes the challenges of the ECT in the face of the climate emergency.
Lukas Schaugg : « Le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie entrave l’action climatique » (in French)
Mis en place il y a plusieurs décennies pour faciliter les investissements dans l’énergie en Europe et en Asie centrale, le Traité sur la charte de l’énergie (TCE) est aujourd’hui contesté et accusé de protéger les investissements dans les énergies fossiles. Face à l’échec des processus de réforme engagés à ce jour, plusieurs pays européens, notamment la France et l’Allemagne, ont décidé de sortir du TCE. Cependant, le traité tente de s’étendre vers l’Afrique au moment où de nouveaux gisements de gaz et de pétrole sont découverts sur le continent. Dans cet entretien, Lukas Schaugg, Analyste en droit international à l’Institut international du développement durable (IISD), décrit les enjeux du TCE à l’heure de l’urgence climatique.