Tracking Progress on Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning for National Adaptation Plan Processes
This synthesis report reviews how 62 countries have integrated monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) into their national adaptation plan (NAP) documents. It also identifies common trends, gaps, and emerging good practices in countries' MEL design and implementation.
Key Messages
-
While a majority of NAPs state that their MEL system implementation is in progress, completed, or planned, only 39% of NAPs specify a timeline, work plan, or roadmap to implement them.
-
Only 45% of countries mention gender-responsive indicators as developed, in progress, or planned in their NAPs—highlighting an incomplete effort in countries' ability to capture whether NAPs reduce risks for the most vulnerable.
MEL systems are a critical component of both the NAP process and the NAP document. They are designed to assess whether adaptation strategies are achieving their intended outcomes, understand how and for whom they are effective and inform necessary adjustments based on evidence.
Not only is MEL a dedicated phase of NAP processes, but these systems also support accountability and institutional learning across the four phases of the iterative adaptation cycle: impact, vulnerability, and risk assessments, planning, implementation, and MEL. It also contributes to strengthening the overall effectiveness of climate resilience efforts while helping to minimize the risk of unintended consequences. Moreover, MEL systems for NAP processes also generate essential information for international climate reporting under the Paris Agreement.
This first synthesis report by the NAP Global Network reviews how 62 countries have integrated MEL into their NAP documents, based on the information provided in their NAP submissions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as of June 30, 2025. It provides a snapshot of how countries describe the status and design of their MEL systems across the four phases of the iterative adaptation cycle. The report also identifies common trends, gaps, and emerging good practices, with case studies illustrating promising approaches to strengthening MEL design and implementation.
You might also be interested in
Integrating the Education Sector Into the National Adaptation Plan Process
This report provides an overview of a climate-resilient education system, highlighting key considerations for including this sector in the national adaptation plan (NAP) process.
What Does the First Global Stocktake Mean for the National Adaptation Plan Process?
This report summarizes the key messages on adaptation from the outcomes of the first global stocktake and provides recommendations and actionable steps on how countries can implement the decisions as part of their national adaptation plan (NAP) processes.
Finance for National Adaptation Plan Processes
This review of 59 multi-sector national adaptation plan (NAP) documents sheds light on how developing countries are addressing adaptation finance issues. The report also highlights good practices and identifies areas for improvement to better support countries in identifying, prioritizing, and mobilizing adaptation finance.
Tracking Progress on the Integration of Nature-Based Solutions in National Adaptation Plan Processes
An overview of how countries have integrated nature-based solutions (NbS), ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA), and biodiversity into their national adaptation plan (NAP) documents.