Synergies Between Biodiversity and Climate Policy Frameworks – A Series of Thematic Papers
Despite growing recognition that climate change and biodiversity loss are highly interlinked, policy efforts addressing both crises in an integrated manner remain limited. There is a need to make better use of existing opportunities to translate synergies into policies and implementation. The upcoming Conferences of Parties under the biodiversity and climate conventions provide further opportunities for this.
In this context, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) contributed to the development of six thematic papers led by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), via the Support Project for the Design and Implementation of the New Global Biodiversity Framework (BioFrame) and the Support Project for the Implementation of the Paris Agreement (SPA), funded under the International Climate Initiative (IKI). These papers are published as a package and provide an overview, sound scientific basis, and inspirational examples and case studies of synergies between biodiversity and climate change commitments on a range of topics covering:
- Legal agreements under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
- Recent scientific findings (e.g. from the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
- Practical implementation aspects related to nature-based solutions
- Good governance
- Multilevel implementation
- Finance
The overall objective of this series is to enhance the understanding and policy uptake of such synergies, including through nature-based solutions, their enabling conditions, and the support mechanisms required for joint implementation and mainstreaming of biodiversity and climate change policies at the national and local levels. It seeks to inspire negotiators, policy- and decision-makers, and practitioners to identify and advocate for options that achieve multiple benefits for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and climate change adaptation and mitigation.
Download these Thematic Papers from adaptationcommunity.net:
- Linkages and Synergies Between International Instruments on Biodiversity and Climate Change
- Linkages Between Biodiversity and Climate Change and the Role of Science-Policy-Practice Interfaces for Ensuring Coherent Policies and Actions
- Nature-Based Solutions: An Approach for Joint Implementation of Climate and Biodiversity Commitments
- Good Governance for Integrated Climate and Biodiversity Policy-Making
- From National to Local Implementation: A Collaborative, Multi-Level Effort to Achieve Joint Climate and Biodiversity Goals
- Delivering Financing for Joint Biodiversity and Climate Solutions
You might also be interested in
20 Years of the Environmental Integrity Group in Global Climate Governance: Lessons and prospects
Delegates from member states of the Environmental Integrity Group reflect on its purpose and contribution to shaping global rules for the climate.
Gender-Responsive National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: Progress and promising examples
This document is the third in a series of synthesis reports that assess progress on gender-responsive approaches in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes at the global level. The progress shown in this report demonstrates the potential of NAP processes as a mechanism for ensuring that climate action addresses gender and social inequalities.
Countries could shift USD 28 billion/year from fossil fuels to clean energy
A new report shows Glasgow Statement signatories must urgently implement their COP 26 pledge to end new international public support for fossil fuels by the 2022 deadline.
Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals
In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to guide public policies and inspire societal actors to promote sustainable development worldwide. The core of this programme is 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with 169 specific targets, most of them to be achieved by 2030. Although the SDGs are not the first effort to set global goals (and they have been criticized earlier on), they are still by far the most comprehensive and detailed attempt by the United Nations to advance sustainable development. After six years of implementation, the question arises whether these 17 SDGs have had any political impact within national and global governance to address pressing challenges such as poverty eradication, social justice and environmental protection.