Should We be Concerned about Competition between Food and Fuel? Analysis of biofuel consumption mandates in the European Union and the United States
In academic literature and research modelling food-market prices, expanding biofuel production is consistently attributed some role in the rising cost of food commodities.
The European Union and United States biofuel markets' account for 62 per cent of 2010 global biofuel consumption and sizeable biofuel consumption targets have been implemented in both economies. This policy brief discusses the impact of European Union and United States consumption targets on food commodity prices and provides a number of recommendations to help reduce competition between already constrained agricultural markets and increasing biofuel production.
A number of findings are provided:
- The speed at which biofuel production has increased over the last decade may have exacerbated food price volatility and contributed to rising food commodity prices.
- The rigidity of biofuel consumption targets and the relative inelasticity of agricultural production will result in ongoing conflict between energy and agricultural markets.
- The range of research and modelling results looking at the role of biofuels in previous food price spikes and modelling their potential future impact on food commodity prices indicate there is some uncertainty in the literature on the exact extent of the role of biofuels.
Several potential options are being discussed by policy-makers. This policy brief discusses two main policy recommendations:
- Reducing the rigidity of biofuel consumption targets imposed by mandates to help ease competition between energy and agricultural markets
- Ensure strong reporting requirements for the European Union's and United States' biofuel policies, including provisions on the use of food crops as feedstocks in order to ensure the issue of increasing food commodity prices are within a formal policy reporting structure.
You might also be interested in
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis Emphasizes Why Canada Should Move Away From Oil and Gas—Not Expand It
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz cut off roughly 25% of the world’s seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade. In response, many countries are diversifying supply chains and increasingly ramping up domestic renewable capacity to improve energy security. Meanwhile, the Government of Canada has taken steps to expand oil and gas production.
Managing Energy Price Crises
This report outlines a strategic decision framework policy-makers can use when responding to fossil fuel price shocks.
Removing a Fossil Fuel Subsidy Is a Means, Not an End—The transition is the point
COFFIS is an international coalition working to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Kim Solberg, part of the team that founded COFFIS, sits down to explain what made it possible—and why, in her view, a subsidy can only be removed as part of the wider transition it's meant to serve.
IISD Submission to the Belém Mission to 1.5
This submission is made in response to the invitation from the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) 29, COP 30, and COP 31 Presidencies on the Belém Mission to 1.5.