Investment Treaty Arbitration: Opportunities to reform arbitral rules and processes
Investors are increasingly turning to investor-state arbitration to challenge a wide range of government measures, including laws, regulations and administrative decisions in all economic sectors.
Less than 20 years ago this form of international arbitration was rarely used to settle disputes between foreign investors and host states. Now it is used frequently, and the number of cases is increasing rapidly. Issues of concern include the lack of transparency, the impartiality and independence of arbitrators, the lack of predictability and consistency of interpretation, and the high costs involved, to name a few. This paper identifies opportunities for the reform of arbitral rules and processes and assesses their potential impact and utility. In addition, the paper looks at the number of investor-state disputes brought under the different arbitration rules and administered by different institutions, and evaluates whether arbitrations conducted under different rules lead to similar outcomes for states and investors. The paper also examines the governing structures of the relevant institutions, comparing the reform opportunities between inter- and non-governmental bodies, and identifies selected areas for possible reform under different rules and institutions, including transparency, arbitrator independence, and consistency and correctness of arbitral awards. Finally, the findings of the paper are discussed in the context of the broader reform debate.
You might also be interested in
The fossil fuel industry has a trillion-dollar secret weapon to kneecap climate action
On his first day in office, President Joe Biden revoked the permit for the controversial Keystone XL Pipeline, which would have brought exceptionally dirty oil south from Canada across the Plains. The project’s owner, Calgary-based TC Energy, saw billions in future profits go up in smoke. So it turned to an arcane but potentially explosive tool to try to recoup the loss, filing a claim under the now-defunct North American Free Trade Agreement. The company is seeking $15 billion.
Deal for Modernized Energy Charter Treaty Insufficient for Ambitious Climate Action
The new "agreement in principle" for a modernized Energy Charter Treaty falls short of pledges to make the trade and investment deal better suited to achieving international climate goals, IISD experts say.
What's the Outlook on Tax Certainty for MNEs Subject to Amount A?
Readers who follow international tax developments will be familiar with the political dynamic that led to last year's unprecedented agreement among 137 countries on the so-called two-pillar solution regarding taxation of business profits of multinational enterprises (MNEs). Numerous countries' piecemeal adoption of digital services taxes and other unilateral tax measures aimed at nonresident MNEs provoked retaliatory action by the US in the form of tariffs, or the threat of tariffs, on a wide range of exports to the US from those countries.
First WTO deal on fishing subsidies hailed as historic despite 'big holes'
After 20 years of failed negotiations, the World Trade Organization has secured a deal to curb harmful subsidies that contribute to overfishing. Conservationists and campaign groups welcomed last week’s agreement as historic, despite criticism of “big holes” in the agreement.