Indonesia-China Trade Relations: The deepening of economic integration amid uncertainty?
The full implementation of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA) in early 2010 caused much anxiety in Indonesia.
The country's private sector and civil society organizations insisted that the government either pull Indonesia out of the agreement or renegotiate its terms with Beijing. Reluctant to breach an international trade agreement, which would harm the country's rising international stature in recent years, the government instead agreed to renegotiate up to 228 tariff lines with its Chinese counterpart. There is little doubt that China will feature strongly in Indonesia's trade relations with the outside world for quite some time to come. Given the limited space now available for Indonesia either to pull out fully from or renegotiate this trade agreement, it is now necessary for both sides to concentrate on the realization of the ACFTA's potential economic benefits as promised under the 2002 Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation between ASEAN and China. For example, Indonesia, other ASEAN member countries and China should address the potentially negative implications of the ACFTA and identify ways in which this trade agreement could assist the acceleration of domestic economic reforms in all participating countries.
You might also be interested in
Navigating the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
A guide for exporters on navigating EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism costs and reporting from 2026 onward—with a focus on steel and aluminum.
Mapping Indonesia’s Battery Electric Vehicle Ecosystem
In a closed-door discussion under Chatham House Rules, policy-makers, industry players, and researchers explored Indonesia’s battery electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem and the policies shaping it.
Rethinking the Global Response to Deforestation
As the EUDR enters a new phase, global efforts to address deforestation are shifting from compliance to broader cooperation on forests, climate, and trade ahead of COP 31.
Decoding the Belt and Road Initiative’s Legal Architecture
This article unpacks the Belt and Road Initiative's legal architecture—covering hard law (such as treaties and contracts), soft law (such as memoranda of understanding), and the unique role of China's state-owned enterprises—and sets out recommendations for host country policy-makers on how to navigate this hybrid legal environment.