IISD’s Mining and Sustainable Development Initiative
The background brief describes the history of IISD’s work and vision on mining and its development to a mature multidisciplinary and inclusive understanding of mining in relation to sustainable development.
IISD’s Mining Initiative seeks to promote inclusive growth and social development without compromising the environment. These interconnected components bring in a set of mutually supportive goals and responsibilities for companies, governments and communities.
The transition to applying the concepts of inclusive growth and social development is essential from a sustainable development viewpoint, and for many companies it is already well underway. Where IISD will make a powerful contribution is in the development of an integrated toolkit that will allow companies, governments and communities to identify an optimal mix of fiscal and non- fiscal economic benefits to maximize a win–win–win conception of mining projects. IISD will achieve this by marrying its economic analysis with its legal expertise to identify the best mechanisms for adopting and implementing these tools in mining and fiscal law frameworks.
The objective of enhancing the social and economic benefits without compromising the environment is equally relevant. While mining will always result in some environmental impacts, the scale, duration and degree of landscape change or air and water impacts will vary by the type of mining (e.g., underground versus strip mining) and scale of the project. These differences must be understood—and strategies developed—that reflect the potential variations in impacts of mining operations on human and ecological systems.
To support the goal of raising awareness among governments and communities about effective tools and opportunities, IISD will develop, apply, revise and promote a model that will enable optimization of the value of mining investments in a win–win–win context. This applied research will be complemented by development of training materials and effective capacity provision.
You might also be interested in
Understanding Investor–State Dispute Settlement in the Mining Sector
This brief introduces investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) for mining policy-makers and shows how understanding it helps governments design clearer rules, manage permits and contracts, prevent costly disputes, and protect policy spaces while maintaining a predictable investment climate.
From Voluntary to Binding
This report examines how sustainability standards and initiatives are integrated into public mining governance, from voluntary to mandatory use, with case studies from Brazil, Madagascar, and Sweden.
Permitting for Critical Minerals
This report examines how governments can streamline permitting for critical mineral mining projects while protecting communities, human health, and the environment. Drawing on case studies across five continents, it identifies the characteristics of efficient permitting systems and provides practical tools for improving processes.
Preserving Tax Sovereignty
As countries negotiate the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, this report examines how its provisions can be shaped to prevent tax disputes from being redirected into ISDS, ensuring they are addressed through tax-specific mechanisms.