G20 Scorecard of Fossil Fuel Funding: South Africa
South Africa is the second-worst performer of the G20 non-Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries thanks to its lack of transparency and continued support for coal production, fossil fuel-based power, and the consumption of fossil fuels. Progress in ending support is poor, with a 14% increase in total government support for fossil fuels relative to the 2014–2016 average.
To learn more, see our full report Doubling Back and Doubling Down: G20 scorecard on fossil fuel funding.
You might also be interested in
Eskom can be a key player in SA’s transition to renewable energy, a new report finds
A new report from the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) suggests that Eskom can be a leader in South Africa’s transition to renewable energy.
Activists in renewed battle with Eskom over new nuclear plant
JOHANNESBURG - CIVIL organisations renewed their long-running battle with Eskom after the state-owned parastatal filed response to the Nuclear-1 Environmental Authorisation (EA) appeal, which could pave way for a nuclear build in Koeberg.
Doubling Back and Doubling Down: G20 scorecard on fossil fuel funding
This study tracks, for the first time, each G20 country's progress on ending support for fossil fuels—ranking their transparency, commitments, and financial support to oil, gas, and coal.
South Africa’s Sasol support incompatible with carbon cuts
South Africa’s subsidy support for Sasol is inefficient and fails to achieve what it sets out to do, namely protect consumers from price shocks, according to IISD.