Weighing up the Environmental Cooperation Agreement under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement
Trade agreements can have important environmental effects. We take a look at what’s old, what’s new and what’s
noteworthy in the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement when it comes to the environment.
Key Messages
- There is a great deal of potential in the cooperation activities of the new side agreement and the new commitments of the environment chapter of the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), but for now they are potential only: time and experience will judge their ultimate utility.
- The Commission for Environmental Cooperation retains most of its previous responsibilities, with the notable exception of the ability to produce unsolicited (so-called Article 13) reports.
- The CUSMA defines “affecting trade or investment” in a novel way, significantly strengthening the standard commitments not to fail to enforce environmental laws, and to respect existing provisions in multilateral environmental agreements on ozone depletion, marine pollution and trade in endangered species.
On November 30, 2018, Canada, Mexico and the United States adopted an Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (ECA) that will take effect when the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) enters into force. The ECA will supersede the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), a side agreement that existed under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Unlike NAFTA, which dealt with the environment only in the side agreement, the CUSMA also has an environmental chapter. The interplay of the CUSMA environment chapter (Chapter 24) and the ECA formalizes how the three countries will cooperate on environmental protection and conservation.
Trade agreements can have important environmental effects. We take a look at what’s old, what’s new and what’s noteworthy in the CUSMA when it comes to the environment.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Unpacking National Investment Laws
This report explores how national investment laws regulate dispute settlement and suggests how to reform them to align with sustainable development and 21st-century policy objectives.
Strait of Hormuz Closure: Implications for African trade resilience
David Beer explores how the crisis in the Middle East is impacting African supply chains, while considering how the continent could turn this disruption into lasting gains for regional trade.
How the Hormuz Blockade Hit Asia
William George and Lynn Hughes assess how China, Japan, and Vietnam are navigating the fallout of the Strait of Hormuz closure and what it reveals about the state of energy security across Asia.
What the Hormuz Crisis Teaches Us About Agriculture’s Strategic Vulnerability
Darcie Doan explains how the Strait of Hormuz closure has exposed vulnerabilities at the heart of global food systems and why the crisis may be a turning point for smarter nitrogen use and long-term resilience.