Submission to the EU Arctic Policy Consultation
The European Union (EU) has invited input to a consultation on its Arctic policy. The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the consultation.
Key Findings
-
The European Union should maintain its commitment to an Arctic moratorium for energy security reasons. New fields in the Arctic would only become operational when the European Union should already be well advanced on its net-zero pathway.
-
Maintaining the commitment to a moratorium will minimize security risks. Because the Barents Sea is shared between Norway and Russia, geopolitical changes have made it a vulnerable area. The more reliant the EU is on oil and gas imports from this region, the more exposed it is to security risks.
-
The Arctic is a vital yet fragile ecosystem. Oil and gas expansion would significantly increase the risk of oil spills, leakages, and harmful underwater noise from shipping and seismic surveys, threatening vulnerable wildlife populations and biodiversity.
-
Key Arctic partners, such as Canada and Greenland, have recognized the need to protect the region from fossil fuel expansion. If the European Union were to pull back from its own commitment, it would fall behind like-minded partners and dilute its credibility as a climate leader.
Since 2016, the EU’s Arctic policy has included a commitment to ensuring that oil, coal, and gas stay in the ground, including in Arctic regions. The European Union opened a consultation on the next iteration of its Arctic policy, and this document is IISD's response.
IISD recommends that the European Union upholds its commitment to an Arctic fossil fuel extraction moratorium in the next iteration of its Arctic policy. Furthermore, IISD recommends that the European Union establishes a clear timeline to phase out imports of fossil fuels originating from north of the Arctic Circle, including from the northern Norwegian and Barents seas.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Carbon Pricing in the ASEAN Region: Moving from ambition to architecture
For ASEAN policy-makers, carbon pricing is no longer simply a domestic climate policy choice. It is increasingly linked to global economic integration, trade relationships, investment flows, and industrial competitiveness.
Bonn Climate Talks 2026: What to expect after Santa Marta
With UN climate talks starting in Bonn soon, the shift to implementation is being felt, especially in the transition away from fossil fuels.
May 2026 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
For the second month in a row, the United States has dominated new licensing activity, awarding 74 new exploration licences in April alone. If fully combusted this could emit 35.5 MtCO2.
Memorandum of Understanding Agreement Erodes Last Pillar of Canadian Climate Policy
The governments of Canada and Alberta have announced new details on an oil pipeline while significantly weakening the industrial carbon price. Doubling down on oil and gas while much of the world is transitioning away from fossil fuels sets Canada on a path toward greater economic risk and worsening climate impacts.