Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to Advance the Low-Carbon Transition
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), if revised, could have a particularly important role to play, given the importance of the energy sector in relation to both contributing to global warming and providing climate change solutions.
Unlike most other investment treaties and chapters in trade agreements covering all sectors and measures indiscriminately, the ECT covers only activities in the energy sector. It covers a large range of activities relating to oil, gas, and coal, as well as wind and solar power and other renewable energy sources.
At a time when climate change is a top priority and the most pressing environmental and developmental issue for the future of our planet, a revised ECT should, from a normative perspective, play an important role in the transition from fossil fuel-based energy to renewable, clean energy.
In order to ensure mutual supportiveness between environmental and economic goals set at the international level, the ECT should be redesigned to bring it in line with—and help achieve—states’ international commitment under the Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
This paper discusses the ECT and the Paris Agreement regimes and their inter-relationship, highlighting how they pull in different directions. It presents three building blocks that could be adopted in a revised ECT to align it with the Paris Agreement: encouraging low-carbon energy investments; discouraging carbon-intensive energy investments; and ensuring a just transition to low-carbon economies and societies. Finally, it proposes ways to reform the ECT through a climate lens as well as through a broader socioeconomic sustainability lens.
This paper was originally published in the Transnational Dispute Management (TDM) 1 (2019) "Modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT)" Special Issue as N. Bernasconi-Osterwalder & M.D. Brauch; "Redesigning the Energy Charter Treaty to Advance the Low-Carbon Transition," TDM 1 (2019), available at https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2632
Republished with permission from TDM.
You might also be interested in
Oil Companies Are Suing to Block Climate Action – With 72% Success
Fossil fuel investors are adopting a bold new legal tactic in response to efforts to limit global warming: they are going to private international tribunals to argue that climate change policies are illegally cutting into their profits and they must therefore be compensated. Now governments are scrambling to figure out how to not get sued for billions when enacting climate policies.
Boom and Bust: The fiscal implications of fossil fuel phase-out in six large emerging economies
Emerging economies need to plan for major reductions in fossil fuel revenues during the clean energy transition and find new sources of income.
Governments Must Live Up to Promises to Stop Funding Oil and Gas Internationally
At COP 26, 39 countries and public finance institutions signed the Glasgow Statement on International Public Support for the Clean Energy Transition. How can signatories get back on track to meet their commitments by the statement's 2022 deadline?
Countries could shift USD 28 billion/year from fossil fuels to clean energy
A new report shows Glasgow Statement signatories must urgently implement their COP 26 pledge to end new international public support for fossil fuels by the 2022 deadline.