Managing Climate Risks in Fragile States
This is true for a number of reasons, including: the high exposure of many fragile states to climate risks; their economic reliance on climate-dependent sectors (particularly rain-fed agriculture); and their histories of conflict, poverty and weak governance, which all serve to increase vulnerability to climate change. A failure to consider and address climate change and risks will undermine peacebuilding programs and projects, and threaten their long-term sustainability.
There is growing consensus among researchers and policy-makers that climate change represents a real threat to peace and security. IISD undertook this research project to examine whether this consensus is reflected among peacebuilding practitioners. Drawing on desk-based research, practitioner surveys and interviews, and workshop discussions, the research aims to provide guidance on how to simultaneously achieve peacebuilding and climate-resilience objectives in practice. To do so, it addresses the following questions:
- Are peacebuilding practitioners operating in conflict-affected fragile states aware of or concerned about climate change and variability?
- If so, what are they doing about it? If not, then why not, and what further guidance do they require?
- To what extent can peacebuilding practitioners access, understand and use existing climate data and information?
- What new information and climate services are needed to design better, more climate-compatible peacebuilding programs?
By answering these questions, the research provides insights on climate-resilient peacebuilding interventions that take into consideration the implications of near- and long-term climate risk as a contributing factor in driving conflict. It also considers conflict-sensitive climate change responses designed to ensure that, at a minimum, interventions do not increase the risk of conflict and, preferably, serve to enhance peacebuilding opportunities. This research also provides guidance for accessing, understanding and using climate information in fragile states, guidance that was tailored to the needs and capacities of peacebuilding practitioners.
Nordhaus Nobel Recognizes What We've Long Known: Carbon pricing works
In 1984, Nordhaus concluded climate change is real, its impacts are global and comparable to economic depression, and it's likely to occur in sudden jolts.
Accessing and Using Climate Data and Information in Fragile, Data-Poor States
The vulnerability of populations in fragile states to weather and climate variability is typically much higher than in other countries. These countries, and their populations, face a higher exposure to climate change as a result of their geography.They are also over-reliant on climate-dependent…
Promoting Climate-Resilient Peacebuilding in Fragile States
Efforts to help fragile states move onto a path toward stability and sustainability continue to face enormous challenges.Climate change is one of these challenges. This is true for a number of reasons: the high exposure of many fragile states to climate risks, their economic reliance on climate…
You might also be interested in
Natural resource management is often a source of conflict.
Conservation and Migration in the Great Lakes Region of Africa
Migration has been used for centuries as a means of adapting to and coping with change in the Great Lakes region of Africa.
The NAP Process and Peacebuilding
This briefing note explores the importance and difficulties of bringing adaptation planning and peacebuilding agendas together in contexts of fragility and instability. It will also highlight some of the countries that have already begun to integrate conflict considerations into their adaptation planning processes.
NAP Global Network
The National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network supports developing countries to advance their NAP processes to help accelerate climate change adaptation efforts around the world.