Financing Models for Soil Remediation in China
The legacy of environmental problems stemming from earlier phases of China’s industrial developments must be addressed.
Estimates suggest nearly 20 per cent of farmland is contaminated in China, with total remediation costs for land and water estimated at six to nine trillion RMB in the next five years for farmland, groundwater and industrial site rehabilitation. It’s expected only about 15 per cent of these funds will be from public sources; the rest will have to be raised from private sources, leveraging capital markets or through public-private partnerships.
If a reformed, “green” finance system is to realize its potential in China, one of its most urgent priorities will be to ensure adequate funding for greener forms of development such as green urban infrastructure, renewable energy, clean industrial technology, public transport and more.
The challenge may seem daunting, but so are the consequences of not addressing the issue. The future stability of the society, and the very legitimacy of the government, is closely linked to building confidence both in the urgency attributed to the issue and visible progress in addressing the worst of the problems.
This is why we’re working on financing models for soil remediation in China.
Our work focuses on the financial vehicles available to attract investment to environmental rehabilitation of degraded land, and the financial reforms needed to make these vehicles a viable and desirable means of investing in land rehabilitation in China. We draw on best practices worldwide in funding environmental rehabilitation, with special focus on the design and use of financial mechanism to attract private investors, share the risk and offer a clear benefit from the rehabilitated land.
We cover the entire spectrum from models that leverage public funding to create financing at scale right across to new social entrepreneurship models and community-based mobilization of funding. We look at the policy framework of incentives and disincentives and identify both policy, regulatory and institutional gaps to be filled.
This work is done in partnership with the Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning (CAEP) under the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) and with the International Institute of Green Finance (IIGF) of the China Central University of Finance and Economics (CUFE), and with both the Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) and Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO) in Norway.
This project is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Join us Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. CEST / 8:00 a.m. GMT to discuss the relevance, opportunities and risks of exploring innovative models and instruments for financing soil remediation projects.
We will explore how soil remediation become a worthwhile investment for holders of private capital, and how can we ensure that the limited investments from the public purse are used optimally. Webinar participants will have the opportunity to ask questions, provide insights and share strategic and other considerations.
Cleaning up Toxic Soils in China: A trillion-dollar question
In its latest effort to address environmental problems, China has adopted its first soil pollution law. However, how to finance the remediation of the damage already done remains a big question.
Financing Models for Soil Remediation in China
This report examines seven different types of soil remediation projects in China and provides a "state-of-play" survey of financing models for soil rehabilitation in China.
Green Finance Approaches to Soil Remediation: International examples
A collection of seven case studies on different financing instruments used to support soil remediation projects.
Financing Soil Remediation: Exploring the use of financing instruments to blend public and private capital
A collection of 17 case studies on a variety of financing instruments that blend public and private capital that could be used to finance the remediation of contaminated soil.
Soil Remediation in China: How a huge pollution problem is putting the green finance movement to the test
IISD, with Chinese and international partners, is testing the potential of the entire spectrum of green finance approaches to deal with China’s legacy of toxic soils and the urgent need to restore them to health and productivity.
You might also be interested in
Task Force for a Resilient Recovery
With ideas from Canada and around the world, our Task Force aims for a resilient recovery—one that delivers good jobs, is positive for the environment, and addresses inequality.
Second Opinions for Green and Sustainability Bonds
We assess the green and sustainability credentials of these bond issuance frameworks. IISD provides this service jointly with CICERO Shades of Green, a leading global provider of Second Opinions.
China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development - CCICED
The China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED) was founded in 1992 as a high-level international advisory body with the approval of the Government of China.
Credit Enhancement for Sustainable Development
Credit enhancement is a collective term for de-risking instruments that transfer key project risks of an infrastructure projects to third parties and by this, enhance the financial viability and investment conditions of the project.