Offsets can help Canada reduce GHG emissions while maintaining industrial competitiveness
WINNIPEG—December 19, 2011—New analysis by the International Institute for Sustainable Development identifies carbon offsets as a key opportunity to cost-effectively reduce Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and achieve its stated reduction target.
"Canada's move to regulate carbon will have a cost impact on industry, and this impact will increase over time as more reductions are sought. Offsets are a cost-effective mitigation option that can help minimize adverse competiveness impacts while broadening the scope of reduction opportunities" said David Sawyer, director of IISD's climate change and energy program and lead author of Offsets and Canada's GHG Regulations: Reducing costs, improving competitiveness and lowering emissions. (See also the Summary Report.)
The report is based on new economic modelling developed to show how offsets might complement sector-by-sector GHG performance regulations as well as how they may help Canada more cost-effectively meet the target it has set for itself. IISD estimates the planned federal and provincial mitigation actions will deliver about 46 per cent of the 2020 national target, or about 103 million tonnes (Mt) of the 225 Mt needed.
The report offers a range of scenarios and discusses their impact on costs and emission reductions. It also reviews other offset programs operating in jurisdictions elsewhere in Canada as well as in Australia, the United States and Europe.
"There is substantial evidence that targeting emitters outside of the regulated sectors can significantly reduce mitigation costs and deliver other important environmental benefits," Sawyer said.
"A well-developed offsets program could deliver significant savings across the economy by offering unregulated sectors, such as agriculture and forestry, an opportunity to reduce Canada's emissions while delivering important co-benefits from ecological goods and services that provide cleaner water and improved flood mitigation."
IISD is working with leading thinkers on mitigation policy to produce a range of policy options that would complement the Government of Canada's move to regulate carbon emissions with performance-based regulations.
"The aim is to develop federal policies that set out the best way to regulate carbon emissions in a way that co-exists with provincial carbon pricing and regulatory actions, and to offer ways to achieve a national carbon mitigation framework for Canada," Sawyer said.
See Regulating Carbon Emissions in Canada for more information about this initiative.
-end-
For more information, please contact David Sawyer by email at dsawyer@iisd.ca, or Nona Pelletier, IISD manager, public affairs at +1 (204) 958-7740, mobile: +1 (204) 962-1303 or email npelletier@iisd.ca.
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
What the G7 Ministerial Could Have Delivered on Fossil Fuel Subsidies Reform
The G7 climate, energy, and environment ministers’ meeting in Turin fell short when it came to breaking the 15 years of gridlock on fossil fuel subsidies. Here are three ways the G7 can use their next meetings to demonstrate measurable progress.
Adaptation is the world's unheralded tool to deal with climate change
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a cut-and-dry way to stop climate change. But how the world responds to the impacts already taking place is a whole other can of worms—a large can, and one that can seem incomprehensible.
Could CSDDD Signal A Tipping Point For Corporate Accountability?
This week has seen the EU agree new rules on supply chain due diligence, one of a set of laws passed including action on toxic air, packaging and packaging waste. What the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive establishes is legal liability for corporates on environmental and human rights issues in the European courts—and that could change the framework of corporate accountability.
Why does the EU want to quit the Energy Charter Treaty?
European lawmakers have backed plans for the EU to exit a treaty that lets fossil fuel firms sue when climate policies hit profits.