KEY FINDINGS: Fossil Fuels: At What Cost? Government support for upstream oil activities in three Canadian provinces

  Fossil Fuels: At What Cost?

 Government support for upstream oil activities in three Canadian provinces:
Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador

Key Findings

·       Subsidies to the oil sector are increasing the level of production. The impact of subsidies on the marginal producer of oil is important. With subsidies in place, oil production nationally is projected to be in the order of 5 per cent larger in 2020, with a range of 0.3 per cent increase in Newfoundland & Labrador to a high of 6 per cent in Alberta. In 2020, the sector is projected to be about twice as large as it was in 2005, with or without subsidies, which implies that subsidies influence growth in the sector but are not a major determinant.

·       Net Exports are fuelled by subsidies. Subsidies are contributing to oil exports, which in turn generate foreign exchange. Our results indicate that net exports in oil (or the trade surplus) increase about 14 per cent nationally with subsidies in place.  

·       The employment benefit of the subsidies is questionable. While the economy does expand with the oil subsidies in place, most of this happens in the capital-intensive oil sector. The impacts on total employment are therefore negligible.

·       Government balances are lower even with higher corporate taxes and royalty payments. While the increased economic activity due to the subsidies does increase corporate taxes and royalties paid, labour taxes are likely lower due to the spending in the capital-intensive oil sector. More significantly, major subsidy outlays are relatively large. Government balances are therefore worse off with the subsidies: the federal government is lower by 1 per cent, Alberta by 5 per cent, and Saskatchewan by 4 per cent. A small increase is observed in the Newfoundland & Labrador budget, where the federal subsidy infusion creates more activity and revenue while not being offset by provincial subsidies paid.

 ·       Subsidies drive production and hence more emissions. Nationally, emissions are about 2 per cent higher in 2020 with the subsidies. In Alberta, the likely increase in emissions attributable to the subsidies is large, with about 5 per cent more provincial emissions than if the subsidies were removed.

·       Non-conventional production is experiencing the greatest benefit from the subsidies, followed by new drilling. With targeted programs for the oil sands, as well as a large share of total production, the oil sands are disproportionately benefiting. Our assessment indicates that the subsidies are adding 6 to 7 per cent more production to the sector and about 12 per cent more emissions. Most of the targeted programs are for more exploration activity and drilling in the provinces.

With oil production forecast to more than double between now and 2020, with or without the subsidies in place, the share of subsidy relative to overall government expenditures could grow. Scaling up current subsidies to future production indicate subsidies more than double as a share of government expenditures.

Media contacts

In Canada:                                                                          In Switzerland:
Nona Pelletier                                                                      Damon Vis-Dunbar
IISD Media and Communications Officer                                   GSI Communications and Network Coordinator
Phone +1 204 958-7740                                                         Phone: +41 22 917-8848
Cell: +1 204 962-1303                                                           Cell: +41 78 818-0501
E-mail: [email protected]                                                       E-mail: [email protected]