Draft Agreement for the Coordinated Suspension of Investor–State Dispute Settlement With Respect to COVID-19-Related Measures and Disputes
As states deal with the public health and economic fallout of COVID-19, those with international investment agreements (IIAs) may also face the risk of a wave of investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) cases with respect to their COVID-19 measures. These measures could include regulations to protect public health and ensure equitable economic recovery. The Agreement for the Coordinated Suspension of Investor–State Dispute Settlement With Respect to COVID-19-Related Measures and Disputes provides language for states to address this risk by suspending treaty-based ISDS for COVID-19-related measures.
Why did IISD develop this draft agreement?
IISD developed the Agreement in response to growing concern among governments that ISDS could undermine their ability to take emergency public health and economic policy measures to respond to COVID-19 and its impacts. Even as the pandemic continues to disrupt lives and societies, international law firms and litigation funders have published guidance on how these measures could be challenged using treaty-based ISDS. Governments have already been threatened with treaty- and contract-based ISDS.
IISD is continuing to work with governments, regional economic communities, and other partners to raise awareness of this threat and provide options for how it can be mitigated.
How was the draft agreement developed?
IISD conducted broad consultations on the draft Agreement, receiving submissions from developing country investment negotiators, international law experts, and civil society organizations. The consultations were undertaken throughout 2020 through:
- Two virtual workshops (in French and English, respectively) for developing country investment negotiators.
- An online consultation on the first draft of the suspension language agreement.
You might also be interested in
Governments Must Shield COVID-19 Measures From Investor-State Arbitration
Governments need to be able to issue COVID-19 support packages without worrying about the possibility of facing a wave of arbitration.
Decoding the Belt and Road Initiative’s Legal Architecture
This article unpacks the Belt and Road Initiative's legal architecture—covering hard law (such as treaties and contracts), soft law (such as memoranda of understanding), and the unique role of China's state-owned enterprises—and sets out recommendations for host country policy-makers on how to navigate this hybrid legal environment.
What Happened in Santa Marta?
What happened at the first international conference on transitioning away from fossil fuels? IISD experts share 7 takeaways and discuss what comes next.
Tax Incentives in National Investment Laws
This report maps the design, legal structure, and governance arrangements of tax incentives across 105 national investment laws to support better coordination among the institutions that shape these policies and help countries attract quality investment.